BCCL.NEO vs. HPYM.TO
BCCL.NEO (Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) and HPYM.TO (Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units) are both exchange-traded funds - BCCL.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Global X, while HPYM.TO is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Harvest. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BCCL.NEO returned -40.36% vs 2.79% for HPYM.TO. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BCCL.NEO vs. HPYM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCCL.NEO achieves a -27.54% return, which is significantly lower than HPYM.TO's -1.25% return.
BCCL.NEO
- 1D
- -3.22%
- 1M
- -17.13%
- YTD
- -27.54%
- 6M
- -33.09%
- 1Y
- -40.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HPYM.TO
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- -1.25%
- 6M
- -1.71%
- 1Y
- 2.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCCL.NEO vs. HPYM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCCL.NEO Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | -27.54% | -6.58% |
HPYM.TO Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units | -1.25% | 2.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCCL.NEO and HPYM.TO is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCCL.NEO vs. HPYM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BCCL.NEO
HPYM.TO
BCCL.NEO vs. HPYM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCL.NEO) and Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BCCL.NEO | HPYM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.11 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 0.73 | -1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | 2.05 | -3.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCCL.NEO | HPYM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.92 | 0.62 | -1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.69 | 0.37 | -1.06 |
Drawdowns
BCCL.NEO vs. HPYM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCCL.NEO drawdown since its inception was -52.47%, which is greater than HPYM.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCCL.NEO and HPYM.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCCL.NEO | HPYM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.47% | -6.19% | -46.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.47% | -3.85% | -48.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.69% | -2.71% | -47.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.15% | -1.94% | -20.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.80% | 1.36% | +28.44% |
Volatility
BCCL.NEO vs. HPYM.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCL.NEO) has a higher volatility of 12.21% compared to Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units (HPYM.TO) at 2.02%. This indicates that BCCL.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HPYM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCCL.NEO | HPYM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.21% | 2.02% | +10.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.89% | 3.28% | +29.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.98% | 4.53% | +39.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.65% | 5.61% | +38.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.65% | 5.61% | +38.04% |
Dividends
BCCL.NEO vs. HPYM.TO - Dividend Comparison
BCCL.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 40.66%, more than HPYM.TO's 9.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BCCL.NEO Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | 40.66% | 16.02% | 0.00% |
HPYM.TO Harvest Premium Yield 7-10 Year Treasury ETF - Class A Units | 9.38% | 9.01% | 8.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCCL.NEO and HPYM.TO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BCCL.NEO is categorized as Derivative Income, while HPYM.TO is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Harvest.
Find the right allocation for BCCL.NEO and HPYM.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer