BCCL.NEO vs. ETHH.TO
BCCL.NEO (Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) and ETHH.TO (Purpose Ether ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BCCL.NEO returned -45.87% vs -48.97% for ETHH.TO. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BCCL.NEO charges 1.78%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for ETHH.TO.
Performance
BCCL.NEO vs. ETHH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCCL.NEO achieves a -28.69% return, which is significantly higher than ETHH.TO's -38.87% return.
BCCL.NEO
- 1D
- -2.49%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- 6M
- -18.01%
- YTD
- -28.69%
- 1Y
- -45.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -28.13%
ETHH.TO
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 6.79%
- 6M
- -21.54%
- YTD
- -38.87%
- 1Y
- -48.97%
- 3Y*
- -3.29%
- 5Y*
- -8.33%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -7.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$76.07K | CA$135.25K | CA$227.19K | |
ETHH.TO Purpose Ether ETF | CA$119.99K | CA$198.31K | CA$386.38K |
BCCL.NEO vs. ETHH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCCL.NEO Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | -28.69% | -6.82% |
ETHH.TO Purpose Ether ETF | -38.87% | 58.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCCL.NEO and ETHH.TO is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025 | 0.79 |
The correlation between BCCL.NEO and ETHH.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCCL.NEO vs. ETHH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BCCL.NEO
ETHH.TO
BCCL.NEO vs. ETHH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCL.NEO) and Purpose Ether ETF (ETHH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCCL.NEO | ETHH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 0.88 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | -0.76 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | -1.12 | -0.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCCL.NEO vs. ETHH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCCL.NEO drawdown since its inception was -55.27%, smaller than the maximum ETHH.TO drawdown of -79.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCCL.NEO and ETHH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCCL.NEO | ETHH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.27% | -79.46% | +24.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.27% | -68.96% | +13.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -68.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -79.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.47% | -67.40% | +15.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.18% | -49.64% | +23.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.35% | 46.41% | -10.06% |
Volatility
BCCL.NEO vs. ETHH.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCL.NEO) is 8.77%, while Purpose Ether ETF (ETHH.TO) has a volatility of 11.69%. This indicates that BCCL.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCCL.NEO | ETHH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.77% | 11.69% | -2.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.62% | 45.66% | -12.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.76% | 66.55% | -19.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.50% | 69.42% | -24.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.50% | 72.59% | -28.09% |
BCCL.NEO vs. ETHH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCCL.NEO has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than ETHH.TO's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCCL.NEO vs. ETHH.TO - Dividend Comparison
BCCL.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.98%, while ETHH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BCCL.NEO Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | 43.98% | 16.02% |
ETHH.TO Purpose Ether ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCCL.NEO and ETHH.TO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETHH.TO is cheaper at 1.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETHH.TO is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.78% for BCCL.NEO.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Purpose. Their fees differ too: 1.78% for BCCL.NEO and 1.00% for ETHH.TO.
Find the right allocation for BCCL.NEO and ETHH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer