BCCL.NEO vs. CCCX.TO
BCCL.NEO (Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF) and CCCX.TO (CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BCCL.NEO charges 1.78%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CCCX.TO.
Performance
BCCL.NEO vs. CCCX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCCL.NEO achieves a -28.69% return, which is significantly higher than CCCX.TO's -33.01% return.
BCCL.NEO
- 1D
- -2.49%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- 6M
- -18.01%
- YTD
- -28.69%
- 1Y
- -45.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -28.13%
CCCX.TO
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- 6M
- -20.03%
- YTD
- -33.01%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$76.07K | CA$135.25K | CA$227.19K | |
| CA$48.80 | CA$263.36 | CA$5.31K |
BCCL.NEO vs. CCCX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCCL.NEO Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | -28.69% | -24.04% |
CCCX.TO CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF | -33.01% | -25.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCCL.NEO and CCCX.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2025 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCCL.NEO vs. CCCX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BCCL.NEO
CCCX.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BCCL.NEO vs. CCCX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF (BCCL.NEO) and CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CCCX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCCL.NEO | CCCX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCCL.NEO vs. CCCX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCCL.NEO drawdown since its inception was -55.27%, smaller than the maximum CCCX.TO drawdown of -58.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCCL.NEO and CCCX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCCL.NEO | CCCX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.27% | -58.93% | +3.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.47% | -54.23% | +2.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.18% | -36.65% | +10.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.35% | — | — |
Volatility
BCCL.NEO vs. CCCX.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCCL.NEO | CCCX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.77% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.62% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.76% | 51.68% | -4.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.50% | 51.68% | -7.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.50% | 51.68% | -7.18% |
BCCL.NEO vs. CCCX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCCL.NEO has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than CCCX.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCCL.NEO vs. CCCX.TO - Dividend Comparison
BCCL.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.98%, while CCCX.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BCCL.NEO Global X Enhanced Bitcoin Covered Call ETF | 43.98% | 16.02% |
CCCX.TO CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCCL.NEO and CCCX.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CCCX.TO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CCCX.TO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.78% for BCCL.NEO.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and CI. Their fees differ too: 1.78% for BCCL.NEO and 0.50% for CCCX.TO.
Find the right allocation for BCCL.NEO and CCCX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer