PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCAIX vs. IVFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCAIX vs. IVFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boston Common ESG Impact International Fund (BCAIX) and Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BCAIX having a 11.08% return and IVFIX slightly higher at 11.54%. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: BCAIX at 7.22% and IVFIX at 7.22%.


BCAIX

1D
-0.41%
1M
0.68%
6M
5.88%
YTD
11.08%
1Y
22.95%
3Y*
12.16%
5Y*
3.79%
10Y*
7.22%
ALL TIME*
5.17%

IVFIX

1D
-0.60%
1M
2.69%
6M
7.03%
YTD
11.54%
1Y
23.84%
3Y*
15.19%
5Y*
10.39%
10Y*
7.22%
ALL TIME*
3.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BCAIX vs. IVFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BCAIX
Boston Common ESG Impact International Fund
11.08%25.22%0.55%11.55%-21.86%3.41%18.56%23.74%-13.46%26.39%
IVFIX
Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund
11.54%31.79%1.91%11.05%-2.54%11.58%-1.74%20.15%-11.96%14.63%

Correlation

The correlation between BCAIX and IVFIX is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2010

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between BCAIX and IVFIX has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCAIX vs. IVFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BCAIX
BCAIX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
BCAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
BCAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

IVFIX
IVFIX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IVFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
IVFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BCAIX vs. IVFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Common ESG Impact International Fund (BCAIX) and Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BCAIXIVFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.45

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

4.20

-2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.28

9.64

-2.36

BCAIX vs. IVFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the IVFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCAIX and IVFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BCAIX vs. IVFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCAIX drawdown since its inception was -37.34%, smaller than the maximum IVFIX drawdown of -51.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCAIX and IVFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCAIXIVFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.34%

-51.49%

+14.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.15%

-6.97%

-5.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.34%

-10.75%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.34%

-21.29%

-16.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.34%

-33.46%

-3.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-0.96%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.57%

-11.55%

+1.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

2.82%

+0.30%

Volatility

BCAIX vs. IVFIX - Volatility Comparison

Boston Common ESG Impact International Fund (BCAIX) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund (IVFIX) at 3.27%. This indicates that BCAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCAIXIVFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

3.27%

+1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.01%

9.73%

+4.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.48%

12.09%

+4.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.83%

13.13%

+3.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.40%

14.56%

+1.84%

BCAIX vs. IVFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BCAIX and IVFIX have an expense ratio of 0.86%.


Dividends

BCAIX vs. IVFIX - Dividend Comparison

BCAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than IVFIX's 3.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCAIX
Boston Common ESG Impact International Fund
3.44%3.82%2.73%2.32%1.26%3.34%0.63%2.25%1.42%1.18%1.61%1.10%
IVFIX
Federated Hermes International Strategic Value Dividend Fund
3.54%3.37%4.44%4.01%3.99%3.67%3.62%3.98%4.97%4.17%3.38%3.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


BCAIX and IVFIX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCAIX has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to IVFIX (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCAIX dropped -37.34% vs IVFIX's -51.49%.

IVFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCAIX and IVFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer