PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BCAIX vs. FSOSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BCAIX vs. FSOSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Boston Common ESG Impact International Fund (BCAIX) and Fidelity Series Overseas Fund (FSOSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCAIX achieves a 9.78% return, which is significantly higher than FSOSX's 5.63% return.


BCAIX

1D
0.44%
1M
4.76%
YTD
9.78%
6M
12.09%
1Y
20.14%
3Y*
11.98%
5Y*
3.51%
10Y*
7.01%

FSOSX

1D
0.96%
1M
3.89%
YTD
5.63%
6M
7.55%
1Y
8.98%
3Y*
13.16%
5Y*
6.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCAIX vs. FSOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BCAIX
Boston Common ESG Impact International Fund
9.78%25.22%0.55%11.55%-21.86%3.41%18.56%8.67%
FSOSX
Fidelity Series Overseas Fund
5.63%21.29%5.87%21.49%-23.25%19.59%16.36%7.78%

Correlation

The correlation between BCAIX and FSOSX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019

0.95

The correlation between BCAIX and FSOSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BCAIX vs. FSOSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCAIX
BCAIX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BCAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BCAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

FSOSX
FSOSX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FSOSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSOSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSOSX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FSOSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSOSX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCAIX vs. FSOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Common ESG Impact International Fund (BCAIX) and Fidelity Series Overseas Fund (FSOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BCAIXFSOSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.10

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

0.68

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.13

2.42

+3.71

BCAIX vs. FSOSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the FSOSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCAIX and FSOSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BCAIXFSOSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

0.50

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.38

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.51

-0.20

Drawdowns

BCAIX vs. FSOSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCAIX drawdown since its inception was -37.34%, which is greater than FSOSX's maximum drawdown of -35.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCAIX and FSOSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BCAIXFSOSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.34%

-35.36%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.15%

-12.39%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.34%

-14.07%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.34%

-35.36%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.31%

+1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.65%

-7.78%

-1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

3.46%

-0.30%

Volatility

BCAIX vs. FSOSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Boston Common ESG Impact International Fund (BCAIX) is 5.10%, while Fidelity Series Overseas Fund (FSOSX) has a volatility of 6.14%. This indicates that BCAIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BCAIXFSOSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.10%

6.14%

-1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.71%

14.30%

-1.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.71%

16.80%

-1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.65%

17.67%

-1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.65%

19.05%

-2.40%

BCAIX vs. FSOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCAIX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than FSOSX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

BCAIX vs. FSOSX - Dividend Comparison

BCAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, less than FSOSX's 8.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCAIX
Boston Common ESG Impact International Fund
3.48%3.82%2.73%2.32%1.26%3.34%0.63%2.25%1.42%1.18%1.61%1.10%
FSOSX
Fidelity Series Overseas Fund
8.66%9.15%2.25%1.63%1.80%2.92%1.12%0.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, BCAIX and FSOSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSOSX has higher volatility (6.14%) compared to BCAIX (5.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCAIX dropped -37.34% vs FSOSX's -35.36%.

BCAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BCAIX and FSOSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer