PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BC94.L vs. ISP.MI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BC94.L vs. ISP.MI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd (BC94.L) and Intesa Sanpaolo SpA (ISP.MI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BC94.L is traded in USD, while ISP.MI is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ISP.MI values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BC94.L achieves a 171.75% return, which is significantly higher than ISP.MI's -1.75% return. Over the past 10 years, BC94.L has outperformed ISP.MI with an annualized return of 27.90%, while ISP.MI has yielded a comparatively lower 19.63% annualized return.


BC94.L

1D
-4.35%
1M
33.77%
YTD
171.75%
6M
219.54%
1Y
434.52%
3Y*
62.43%
5Y*
26.70%
10Y*
27.90%

ISP.MI

1D
0.96%
1M
1.47%
YTD
-1.75%
6M
4.46%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
51.57%
5Y*
27.37%
10Y*
19.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BC94.L vs. ISP.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BC94.L
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd
171.75%130.23%-38.22%37.91%-31.58%-8.20%58.92%40.94%-25.70%62.80%
ISP.MI
Intesa Sanpaolo SpA
-1.77%85.33%50.11%44.04%-6.98%19.27%3.80%30.34%-28.42%39.17%

Correlation

The correlation between BC94.L and ISP.MI is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2007

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BC94.L vs. ISP.MI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BC94.L
BC94.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BC94.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BC94.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BC94.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BC94.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BC94.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

ISP.MI
ISP.MI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ISP.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISP.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISP.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
ISP.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISP.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BC94.L vs. ISP.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd (BC94.L) and Intesa Sanpaolo SpA (ISP.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BC94.LISP.MIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+7.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.81

1.19

+0.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

19.59

1.32

+18.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

66.09

4.15

+61.94

BC94.L vs. ISP.MI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BC94.L Sharpe Ratio is 8.64, which is higher than the ISP.MI Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BC94.L and ISP.MI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BC94.LISP.MIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.64

1.06

+7.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.90

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.59

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.14

+0.39

Drawdowns

BC94.L vs. ISP.MI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BC94.L drawdown since its inception was -64.96%, smaller than the maximum ISP.MI drawdown of -82.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BC94.L and ISP.MI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BC94.LISP.MIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.96%

-82.49%

+17.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.00%

-20.57%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.67%

-21.31%

-23.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.99%

-49.79%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.66%

-57.13%

+2.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.88%

-5.53%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.12%

-38.14%

+20.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.53%

6.55%

-0.02%

Volatility

BC94.L vs. ISP.MI - Volatility Comparison

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd (BC94.L) has a higher volatility of 22.24% compared to Intesa Sanpaolo SpA (ISP.MI) at 7.26%. This indicates that BC94.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISP.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BC94.LISP.MIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.24%

7.26%

+14.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.19%

20.02%

+22.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.89%

25.74%

+24.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.45%

30.07%

+4.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.75%

32.83%

-0.08%

Dividends

BC94.L vs. ISP.MI - Dividend Comparison

BC94.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than ISP.MI's 6.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BC94.L
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd
0.27%0.80%2.29%1.52%2.12%1.64%3.06%2.09%3.09%1.37%1.43%1.32%
ISP.MI
Intesa Sanpaolo SpA
6.61%6.03%8.34%8.86%7.35%9.12%10.04%8.39%10.46%6.43%5.77%2.27%

Financials

BC94.L vs. ISP.MI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd and Intesa Sanpaolo SpA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. BC94.L values in USD, ISP.MI values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


BC94.L and ISP.MI have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BC94.L and ISP.MI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer