BC94.L vs. GOLD.AS
BC94.L (Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd) is a stock, while GOLD.AS (Amundi Physical Gold ETC C) is Precious Metals fund tracking the LMBA Gold Price PM USD. Over the past 5 years, BC94.L returned 26.70%/yr vs 18.61%/yr for GOLD.AS. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BC94.L vs. GOLD.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BC94.L achieves a 171.75% return, which is significantly higher than GOLD.AS's 3.60% return.
BC94.L
- 1D
- -4.35%
- 1M
- 23.24%
- YTD
- 171.75%
- 6M
- 208.14%
- 1Y
- 418.37%
- 3Y*
- 62.43%
- 5Y*
- 26.70%
- 10Y*
- 27.90%
GOLD.AS
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -4.78%
- YTD
- 3.60%
- 6M
- 6.06%
- 1Y
- 32.81%
- 3Y*
- 31.56%
- 5Y*
- 18.61%
- 10Y*
- —
BC94.L vs. GOLD.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BC94.L Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd | 171.75% | 130.23% | -38.22% | 37.91% | -31.58% | -8.20% | 58.92% | 32.84% |
GOLD.AS Amundi Physical Gold ETC C | 3.60% | 64.94% | 26.36% | 13.35% | -0.13% | -4.09% | 24.31% | 18.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between BC94.L and GOLD.AS is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2019 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BC94.L vs. GOLD.AS — Risk / Return Rank
BC94.L
GOLD.AS
BC94.L vs. GOLD.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd (BC94.L) and Amundi Physical Gold ETC C (GOLD.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BC94.L | GOLD.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.81 | 1.25 | +0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 19.59 | 1.79 | +17.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 66.09 | 4.71 | +61.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BC94.L | GOLD.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.64 | 1.28 | +7.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 1.06 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 1.11 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
BC94.L vs. GOLD.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BC94.L drawdown since its inception was -64.96%, which is greater than GOLD.AS's maximum drawdown of -21.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BC94.L and GOLD.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BC94.L | GOLD.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.96% | -21.14% | -43.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.00% | -17.83% | -4.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.67% | -17.83% | -26.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.33% | -21.14% | -28.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.88% | -15.66% | +9.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.12% | -6.29% | -11.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.53% | 6.81% | -0.28% |
Volatility
BC94.L vs. GOLD.AS - Volatility Comparison
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd (BC94.L) has a higher volatility of 22.24% compared to Amundi Physical Gold ETC C (GOLD.AS) at 6.14%. This indicates that BC94.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOLD.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BC94.L | GOLD.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.24% | 6.14% | +16.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.19% | 22.05% | +20.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.89% | 25.03% | +24.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.45% | 17.26% | +17.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.75% | 17.01% | +15.74% |
Dividends
BC94.L vs. GOLD.AS - Dividend Comparison
BC94.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, while GOLD.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BC94.L Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd | 0.27% | 0.80% | 2.29% | 1.52% | 2.12% | 1.64% | 3.06% | 2.09% | 3.09% | 1.37% | 1.43% | 1.32% |
GOLD.AS Amundi Physical Gold ETC C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BC94.L and GOLD.AS have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BC94.L and GOLD.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer