BBYY vs. USO
BBYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - BBYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. BBYY is actively managed, while USO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. BBYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.
Performance
BBYY vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBYY achieves a -14.90% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 92.34% return.
BBYY
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- -5.35%
- YTD
- -14.90%
- 6M
- -20.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USO
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- 92.34%
- 6M
- 84.96%
- 1Y
- 90.22%
- 3Y*
- 27.76%
- 5Y*
- 22.99%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
BBYY vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BBYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF | -14.90% | -7.49% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 92.34% | 1.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBYY and USO is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBYY vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
BBYY
USO
BBYY vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF (BBYY) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBYY | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.26 | -0.18 | -1.07 |
Drawdowns
BBYY vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBYY drawdown since its inception was -24.03%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBYY and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBYY | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.03% | -98.19% | +74.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.03% | -85.85% | +61.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.22% | -75.30% | +63.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.87% | — |
Volatility
BBYY vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBYY | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 38.49% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.61% | 44.41% | -18.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.61% | 36.09% | -10.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.61% | 39.01% | -13.40% |
BBYY vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBYY vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
BBYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.09%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BBYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF | 88.09% | 21.98% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBYY and USO have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USO is cheaper at 0.86% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USO is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for BBYY.
BBYY has the higher dividend yield at 88.09%, compared with 0.00% for USO.
BBYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while USO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and USCF. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for BBYY and 0.86% for USO.
Find the right allocation for BBYY and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer