BBYY vs. SGOV
BBYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF) and SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while SGOV is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. BBYY is actively managed, while SGOV is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. BBYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SGOV.
Performance
BBYY vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBYY achieves a -22.45% return, which is significantly lower than SGOV's 1.71% return.
BBYY
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -11.79%
- YTD
- -22.45%
- 6M
- -24.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGOV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- 4.68%
- 5Y*
- 3.58%
- 10Y*
- —
BBYY vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BBYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF | -22.45% | -7.92% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 1.71% | 0.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBYY and SGOV is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBYY vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank
BBYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SGOV
BBYY vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF (BBYY) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBYY | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 194.05 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 395.07 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4,426.92 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBYY vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBYY drawdown since its inception was -30.77%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBYY and SGOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBYY | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.77% | -0.03% | -30.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.77% | 0.00% | -30.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.12% | -0.00% | -13.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
BBYY vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBYY | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.13% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.04% | 0.19% | +24.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.04% | 0.24% | +24.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.04% | 0.24% | +24.80% |
BBYY vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBYY vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison
BBYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 100.57%, more than SGOV's 3.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF | 100.57% | 21.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 3.85% | 4.10% | 5.10% | 4.87% | 1.45% | 0.03% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBYY and SGOV have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for BBYY.
BBYY has the higher dividend yield at 100.57%, compared with 3.85% for SGOV.
BBYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for BBYY and 0.09% for SGOV.
Find the right allocation for BBYY and SGOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer