BBYY vs. LQTI
BBYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.
Performance
BBYY vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBYY achieves a -13.56% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's 0.16% return.
BBYY
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -2.17%
- YTD
- -13.56%
- 6M
- -17.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- 5.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBYY vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BBYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF | -13.56% | -7.49% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 0.16% | -0.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBYY and LQTI is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2025 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBYY vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
BBYY
LQTI
BBYY vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF (BBYY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBYY | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.20 | 0.88 | -2.08 |
Drawdowns
BBYY vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBYY drawdown since its inception was -23.74%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBYY and LQTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBYY | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.74% | -3.41% | -20.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.83% | -1.44% | -21.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.07% | -0.88% | -11.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.11% | — |
Volatility
BBYY vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBYY | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.72% | 5.10% | +20.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.72% | 5.97% | +19.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.72% | 5.97% | +19.75% |
BBYY vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBYY vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
BBYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 84.93%, more than LQTI's 9.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BBYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF | 84.93% | 21.98% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.11% | 7.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBYY and LQTI have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for BBYY.
BBYY has the higher dividend yield at 84.93%, compared with 9.11% for LQTI.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for BBYY and 0.65% for LQTI.
Find the right allocation for BBYY and LQTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer