BBYY vs. EINC

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

BBYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. BBYY is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. BBYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.

Performance

BBYY vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF (BBYY) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBYY achieves a -21.74% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 29.98% return.

BBYY

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -1.94%
• 6M: -26.26%
• YTD: -21.74%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EINC

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 6.31%
• 6M: 26.97%
• YTD: 29.98%
• 1Y: 33.81%
• 3Y*: 28.75%
• 5Y*: 23.18%
• 10Y*: 11.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBYY vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BBYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF	-21.74%	-7.92%
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	29.98%	3.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BBYY and EINC is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025	-0.08

Return for Risk

BBYY vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBYY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EINC

EINC Risk / Return Rank: 83
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 82
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBYY vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF (BBYY) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBYY	EINC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.20	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.96	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.31	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.56	—

Drawdowns

BBYY vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBYY drawdown since its inception was -33.11%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBYY and EINC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBYY	EINC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.11%	-87.55%	+54.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.89%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.01%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.87%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-68.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.14%	-1.46%	-28.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.80%	-43.96%	+29.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.21%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BBYY	EINC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.39%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.37%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.14%	15.44%	+8.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.14%	19.57%	+4.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.14%	25.33%	-1.19%

BBYY vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBYY vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

BBYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 107.49%, more than EINC's 3.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF	107.49%	21.98%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	3.41%	4.51%	3.33%	3.77%	2.89%	6.03%	6.69%	9.66%	11.31%	8.53%	9.71%	28.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBYY and EINC in my portfolio?

BBYY and EINC have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BBYY or EINC?

On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBYY or EINC?

EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for BBYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBYY or EINC?

BBYY has the higher dividend yield at 107.49%, compared with 3.41% for EINC.

What is the main difference between BBYY and EINC?

BBYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while EINC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for BBYY and 0.45% for EINC.