BBYY vs. AVGW
BBYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF) and AVGW (Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BBYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AVGW.
Performance
BBYY vs. AVGW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBYY achieves a -18.61% return, which is significantly lower than AVGW's 12.63% return.
BBYY
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 6.70%
- 6M
- -24.82%
- YTD
- -18.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
AVGW
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 9.99%
- 6M
- 19.26%
- YTD
- 12.63%
- 1Y
- 36.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 34.62%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $707.36K | $768.39K | $1.35M | |
| $45.58K | $28.48K | $34.92K |
BBYY vs. AVGW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BBYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF | -18.61% | -7.92% |
AVGW Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF | 12.63% | -2.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBYY and AVGW is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBYY vs. AVGW — Risk / Return Rank
BBYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AVGW
BBYY vs. AVGW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF (BBYY) and Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF (AVGW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBYY | AVGW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.16 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.05 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.08 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBYY vs. AVGW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBYY drawdown since its inception was -33.11%, roughly equal to the maximum AVGW drawdown of -34.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBYY and AVGW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBYY | AVGW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.11% | -34.65% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -34.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.34% | -22.78% | -4.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.59% | -14.07% | -1.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 17.55% | — |
Volatility
BBYY vs. AVGW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBYY | AVGW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 41.22% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.59% | 57.03% | -33.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.59% | 56.49% | -32.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.59% | 56.49% | -32.90% |
BBYY vs. AVGW - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBYY vs. AVGW - Dividend Comparison
BBYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 107.27%, more than AVGW's 71.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AVGW Roundhill AVGO WeeklyPay™ ETF | 71.22% | 31.15% |
BBYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST BABA ETF | 107.27% | 21.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBYY and AVGW have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVGW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVGW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for BBYY.
BBYY has the higher dividend yield at 107.27%, compared with 71.22% for AVGW.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for BBYY and 0.99% for AVGW.
Find the right allocation for BBYY and AVGW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer