PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBVLX vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBVLX vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund (BBVLX) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BBVLX having a 8.97% return and IVV slightly higher at 9.08%. Over the past 10 years, BBVLX has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 12.17%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.47% annualized return.


BBVLX

1D
1.60%
1M
2.31%
YTD
8.97%
6M
0.21%
1Y
9.84%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
9.56%
10Y*
12.17%

IVV

1D
0.55%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
9.08%
6M
9.43%
1Y
24.38%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
13.42%
10Y*
15.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBVLX vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBVLX
Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund
8.97%4.45%22.32%13.84%-5.32%26.23%9.57%28.49%-8.15%17.20%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
9.08%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between BBVLX and IVV is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2015

0.87

The correlation between BBVLX and IVV shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBVLX vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBVLX
BBVLX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
BBVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BBVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBVLX vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund (BBVLX) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBVLXIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.36

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

2.76

-1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.53

12.43

-9.90

BBVLX vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBVLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBVLX and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBVLX vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBVLX drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBVLX and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBVLXIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.48%

-55.25%

+16.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.28%

-8.89%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.58%

-18.75%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.24%

-24.53%

+6.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.48%

-33.90%

-4.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-2.35%

+1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-10.77%

+6.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

1.97%

+2.13%

Volatility

BBVLX vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund (BBVLX) is 3.67%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 4.37%. This indicates that BBVLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBVLXIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

4.37%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.13%

9.59%

+1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.36%

12.28%

+1.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.33%

16.95%

-0.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.95%

18.08%

-0.13%

BBVLX vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBVLX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBVLX vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

BBVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than IVV's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBVLX
Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund
1.68%1.89%14.73%5.11%9.12%7.09%1.62%1.80%3.45%2.23%1.68%1.24%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.08%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBVLX and IVV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVV has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to BBVLX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBVLX dropped -38.48% vs IVV's -55.25%.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBVLX and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer