PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBVLX vs. FLCOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBVLX vs. FLCOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund (BBVLX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBVLX achieves a 13.59% return, which is significantly lower than FLCOX's 21.79% return.


BBVLX

1D
0.97%
1M
2.12%
6M
9.89%
YTD
13.59%
1Y
13.84%
3Y*
15.14%
5Y*
10.78%
10Y*
12.19%
ALL TIME*
11.12%

FLCOX

1D
1.00%
1M
2.94%
6M
15.38%
YTD
21.79%
1Y
32.76%
3Y*
19.01%
5Y*
12.11%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BBVLX vs. FLCOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBVLX
Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund
13.59%4.45%22.32%13.84%-5.32%26.23%9.57%28.49%-8.15%17.20%
FLCOX
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund
21.79%15.90%14.38%11.48%-7.57%25.09%2.87%26.54%-8.38%10.90%

Correlation

The correlation between BBVLX and FLCOX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.96

The correlation between BBVLX and FLCOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBVLX vs. FLCOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBVLX
BBVLX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
BBVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BBVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCOX
FLCOX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FLCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBVLX vs. FLCOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund (BBVLX) and Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBVLXFLCOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.55

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

5.04

-3.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.77

21.64

-17.87

BBVLX vs. FLCOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBVLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the FLCOX Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBVLX and FLCOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBVLX vs. FLCOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBVLX drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, roughly equal to the maximum FLCOX drawdown of -38.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBVLX and FLCOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBVLXFLCOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.48%

-38.28%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.28%

-6.80%

-4.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.58%

-15.60%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.24%

-19.00%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-4.38%

+0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

1.58%

+2.52%

Volatility

BBVLX vs. FLCOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund (BBVLX) is 2.60%, while Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund (FLCOX) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that BBVLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBVLXFLCOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

2.81%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.39%

8.76%

-0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.24%

11.34%

+1.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.22%

14.84%

+1.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.88%

17.56%

+0.32%

BBVLX vs. FLCOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBVLX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCOX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBVLX vs. FLCOX - Dividend Comparison

BBVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than FLCOX's 0.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBVLX
Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund
1.58%1.89%14.73%5.11%9.12%7.09%1.62%1.80%3.45%2.23%1.68%1.24%
FLCOX
Fidelity Large Cap Value Index Fund
0.86%1.51%1.92%1.99%2.01%1.55%2.28%3.82%2.79%0.60%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, BBVLX and FLCOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FLCOX has higher volatility (2.81%) compared to BBVLX (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBVLX dropped -38.48% vs FLCOX's -38.28%.

FLCOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBVLX and FLCOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer