PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBTR.DE vs. JPCT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBTR.DE vs. JPCT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBTR.DE) and JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPCT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBTR.DE achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly lower than JPCT.DE's 7.39% return.


BBTR.DE

1D
0.12%
1M
0.84%
YTD
1.03%
6M
0.24%
1Y
1.98%
3Y*
-0.04%
5Y*
0.35%
10Y*

JPCT.DE

1D
0.24%
1M
3.19%
YTD
7.39%
6M
7.37%
1Y
18.55%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
11.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBTR.DE vs. JPCT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BBTR.DE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
1.03%-5.45%6.15%0.23%-7.48%5.70%-3.79%
JPCT.DE
JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc)
7.39%6.84%24.37%19.66%-14.19%34.64%2.14%

Correlation

The correlation between BBTR.DE and JPCT.DE is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2020

0.01

The correlation between BBTR.DE and JPCT.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (all time) to 0.17 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBTR.DE vs. JPCT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBTR.DE
BBTR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
BBTR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBTR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBTR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
BBTR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBTR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

JPCT.DE
JPCT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
JPCT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPCT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPCT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
JPCT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPCT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBTR.DE vs. JPCT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBTR.DE) and JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPCT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBTR.DEJPCT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.30

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

2.11

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.02

8.45

-7.43

BBTR.DE vs. JPCT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBTR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the JPCT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBTR.DE and JPCT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBTR.DEJPCT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

1.59

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.81

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.96

-0.91

Drawdowns

BBTR.DE vs. JPCT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBTR.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.63%, smaller than the maximum JPCT.DE drawdown of -22.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBTR.DE and JPCT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBTR.DEJPCT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.63%

-22.18%

+4.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.05%

-8.78%

+4.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.14%

-22.18%

+11.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.20%

-22.18%

+8.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.35%

-0.17%

-13.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.31%

-4.13%

-6.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

2.20%

-0.57%

Volatility

BBTR.DE vs. JPCT.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBTR.DE) is 0.94%, while JPMorgan Carbon Transition Global Equity UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JPCT.DE) has a volatility of 2.80%. This indicates that BBTR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPCT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBTR.DEJPCT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

2.80%

-1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.82%

8.42%

-4.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.52%

11.67%

-6.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.19%

14.13%

-5.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.07%

13.89%

-5.82%

BBTR.DE vs. JPCT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBTR.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than JPCT.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBTR.DE vs. JPCT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither BBTR.DE nor JPCT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BBTR.DE and JPCT.DE have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BBTR.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBTR.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for JPCT.DE.

BBTR.DE is categorized as Government Bonds, while JPCT.DE is Global Equities. BBTR.DE tracks J.P. Morgan Government Bond US Index, while JPCT.DE tracks Solactive JP Morgan Asset Management Carbon Transition Global Equity. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBTR.DE and 0.19% for JPCT.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBTR.DE and JPCT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer