BBSU.L vs. MOGB.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BBSU.L (JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc)) and MOGB.L (VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from JPMorgan and VanEck respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBSU.L returned 14.50%/yr vs 4.31%/yr for MOGB.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBSU.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MOGB.L.

Performance

BBSU.L vs. MOGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) and VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

BBSU.L is traded in GBp, while MOGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MOGB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBSU.L achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly higher than MOGB.L's -2.45% return.

BBSU.L

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 5.58%
• YTD: 10.31%
• 6M: 10.11%
• 1Y: 28.62%
• 3Y*: 19.09%
• 5Y*: 14.50%
• 10Y*: —

MOGB.L

• 1D: 1.16%
• 1M: 3.10%
• YTD: -2.45%
• 6M: -3.89%
• 1Y: 9.50%
• 3Y*: 5.38%
• 5Y*: 4.31%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBSU.L vs. MOGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BBSU.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc)	10.31%	9.39%	27.19%	20.71%	-10.46%	29.25%	16.07%	11.91%
MOGB.L VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF	-2.45%	-0.00%	12.94%	11.88%	-9.07%	27.24%	9.78%	15.18%

Correlation

The correlation between BBSU.L and MOGB.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019	0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between BBSU.L and MOGB.L has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

BBSU.L vs. MOGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBSU.L

BBSU.L Risk / Return Rank: 79
BBSU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BBSU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
BBSU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
BBSU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
BBSU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 69

MOGB.L

MOGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 21
MOGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
MOGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
MOGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 21
MOGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
MOGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBSU.L vs. MOGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) and VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBSU.L	MOGB.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.70	0.76	+1.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.60	1.17	+2.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.14	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.65	0.86	+2.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.74	2.08	+10.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBSU.L vs. MOGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBSU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the MOGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBSU.L and MOGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBSU.L	MOGB.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.70	0.76	+1.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00	0.30	+0.71
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	0.56	+0.39

Drawdowns

BBSU.L vs. MOGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBSU.L drawdown since its inception was -25.80%, which is greater than MOGB.L's maximum drawdown of -24.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSU.L and MOGB.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBSU.L	MOGB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.80%	-24.07%	-1.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.80%	-11.01%	+3.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.42%	-22.73%	+1.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.42%	-22.73%	+1.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-6.72%	+6.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.72%	-4.79%	+1.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	4.54%	-2.30%

Volatility

BBSU.L vs. MOGB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) is 2.64%, while VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOGB.L) has a volatility of 3.24%. This indicates that BBSU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBSU.L	MOGB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.64%	3.24%	-0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.21%	8.51%	-1.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.54%	12.44%	-1.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.45%	14.51%	-0.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.10%	16.20%	-0.10%

BBSU.L vs. MOGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBSU.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MOGB.L's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBSU.L vs. MOGB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BBSU.L nor MOGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBSU.L and MOGB.L in my portfolio?

BBSU.L and MOGB.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BBSU.L or MOGB.L?

On fees, BBSU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBSU.L or MOGB.L?

BBSU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MOGB.L.

What is the main difference between BBSU.L and MOGB.L?

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for BBSU.L and 0.49% for MOGB.L.