BBSU.L vs. JREU.L
BBSU.L (JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc)) and JREU.L (JPMorgan US Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from JPMorgan tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBSU.L returned 14.50%/yr vs 14.88%/yr for JREU.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBSU.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for JREU.L.
Performance
BBSU.L vs. JREU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BBSU.L is traded in GBp, while JREU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JREU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BBSU.L having a 10.31% return and JREU.L slightly lower at 9.96%.
BBSU.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 10.31%
- 6M
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- 28.62%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- 14.50%
- 10Y*
- —
JREU.L
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 4.79%
- YTD
- 9.96%
- 6M
- 9.74%
- 1Y
- 27.93%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- 14.88%
- 10Y*
- —
BBSU.L vs. JREU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBSU.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) | 10.31% | 9.39% | 27.19% | 20.71% | -10.46% | 29.25% | 16.07% | 11.91% |
JREU.L JPMorgan US Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) | 9.96% | 8.01% | 27.31% | 21.94% | -9.26% | 31.81% | 16.10% | 11.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBSU.L and JREU.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019 | 0.93 |
The correlation between BBSU.L and JREU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
BBSU.L vs. JREU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBSU.L
JREU.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BBSU.L
JREU.L
Financial Services
BBSU.L
JREU.L
Communication Services
BBSU.L
JREU.L
Consumer Cyclical
BBSU.L
JREU.L
Healthcare
BBSU.L
JREU.L
Industrials
BBSU.L
JREU.L
Consumer Defensive
BBSU.L
JREU.L
Energy
BBSU.L
JREU.L
Utilities
BBSU.L
JREU.L
Real Estate
BBSU.L
JREU.L
Basic Materials
BBSU.L
JREU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBSU.L vs. JREU.L — Risk / Return Rank
BBSU.L
JREU.L
BBSU.L vs. JREU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) and JPMorgan US Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBSU.L | JREU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.43 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | 4.03 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.74 | 14.26 | -1.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBSU.L | JREU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70 | 2.36 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 0.96 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.89 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
BBSU.L vs. JREU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBSU.L drawdown since its inception was -25.80%, roughly equal to the maximum JREU.L drawdown of -26.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSU.L and JREU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBSU.L | JREU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.80% | -26.72% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.80% | -6.90% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.42% | -21.60% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.42% | -21.60% | +0.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -0.24% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -3.73% | +0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 1.95% | +0.29% |
Volatility
BBSU.L vs. JREU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) is 2.64%, while JPMorgan US Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREU.L) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that BBSU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JREU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBSU.L | JREU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 3.42% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.21% | 8.52% | -1.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.54% | 11.80% | -1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 15.53% | -1.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.10% | 17.40% | -1.30% |
BBSU.L vs. JREU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBSU.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than JREU.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBSU.L vs. JREU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BBSU.L nor JREU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, BBSU.L and JREU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BBSU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBSU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for JREU.L.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for BBSU.L and 0.20% for JREU.L.
Find the right allocation for BBSU.L and JREU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer