PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBSU.L vs. JREG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBSU.L vs. JREG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) and JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BBSU.L is traded in GBp, while JREG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JREG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BBSU.L having a 10.31% return and JREG.L slightly lower at 9.88%.


BBSU.L

1D
0.07%
1M
5.58%
YTD
10.31%
6M
10.11%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
14.50%
10Y*

JREG.L

1D
0.14%
1M
4.54%
YTD
9.88%
6M
9.92%
1Y
26.47%
3Y*
17.17%
5Y*
13.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBSU.L vs. JREG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BBSU.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc)
10.31%9.39%27.19%20.71%-10.46%29.25%16.07%11.91%
JREG.L
JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc)
9.88%11.22%20.75%19.41%-7.92%25.50%13.77%10.20%

Correlation

The correlation between BBSU.L and JREG.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019

0.89

The correlation between BBSU.L and JREG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBSU.L vs. JREG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBSU.L
JREG.L

Technology

35.4%
28.6%

Financial Services

11.8%
15.4%

Communication Services

11.5%
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.6%
8.9%

Industrials

8.4%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.6%

Energy

3.6%
4.2%

Utilities

2.3%
2.9%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.7%

Basic Materials

1.7%
3.2%

Technology

BBSU.L
35.4%
JREG.L
28.6%

Financial Services

BBSU.L
11.8%
JREG.L
15.4%

Communication Services

BBSU.L
11.5%
JREG.L
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

BBSU.L
10.1%
JREG.L
10.1%

Healthcare

BBSU.L
8.6%
JREG.L
8.9%

Industrials

BBSU.L
8.4%
JREG.L
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

BBSU.L
4.8%
JREG.L
4.6%

Energy

BBSU.L
3.6%
JREG.L
4.2%

Utilities

BBSU.L
2.3%
JREG.L
2.9%

Real Estate

BBSU.L
1.8%
JREG.L
1.7%

Basic Materials

BBSU.L
1.7%
JREG.L
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBSU.L vs. JREG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBSU.L
BBSU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BBSU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBSU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBSU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
BBSU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBSU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

JREG.L
JREG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
JREG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JREG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
JREG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
JREG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
JREG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBSU.L vs. JREG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) and JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBSU.LJREG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.42

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

4.05

-0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.74

15.89

-3.15

BBSU.L vs. JREG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBSU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the JREG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBSU.L and JREG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBSU.LJREG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

2.28

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.92

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.86

+0.10

Drawdowns

BBSU.L vs. JREG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBSU.L drawdown since its inception was -25.80%, roughly equal to the maximum JREG.L drawdown of -25.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSU.L and JREG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBSU.LJREG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.80%

-25.88%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.80%

-6.51%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.42%

-18.75%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.42%

-18.75%

-2.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-0.18%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-3.17%

-0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

1.66%

+0.58%

Volatility

BBSU.L vs. JREG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) is 2.64%, while JPMorgan Global Research Enhanced Index Equity UCITS ETF - USD (acc) (JREG.L) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that BBSU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JREG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBSU.LJREG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

3.26%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.21%

8.75%

-1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.54%

11.57%

-1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

14.39%

+0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.10%

16.18%

-0.08%

BBSU.L vs. JREG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBSU.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than JREG.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBSU.L vs. JREG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BBSU.L nor JREG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BBSU.L and JREG.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BBSU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBSU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JREG.L.

BBSU.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while JREG.L is Global Equities. BBSU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while JREG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for BBSU.L and 0.25% for JREG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBSU.L and JREG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer