BBSU.L vs. JPGL.L
BBSU.L (JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc)) and JPGL.L (JPM Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - BBSU.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while JPGL.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBSU.L returned 14.50%/yr vs 10.40%/yr for JPGL.L. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BBSU.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for JPGL.L.
Performance
BBSU.L vs. JPGL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BBSU.L is traded in GBp, while JPGL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JPGL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBSU.L achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly lower than JPGL.L's 10.85% return.
BBSU.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 10.31%
- 6M
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- 28.62%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- 14.50%
- 10Y*
- —
JPGL.L
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 10.85%
- 6M
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 22.77%
- 3Y*
- 13.86%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- —
BBSU.L vs. JPGL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBSU.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) | 10.31% | 9.39% | 27.19% | 20.71% | -10.46% | 29.25% | 16.07% | 1.29% |
JPGL.L JPM Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.85% | 9.80% | 12.27% | 7.60% | 0.48% | 24.47% | 3.06% | -0.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBSU.L and JPGL.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BBSU.L and JPGL.L has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
BBSU.L vs. JPGL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBSU.L
JPGL.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BBSU.L
JPGL.L
Financial Services
BBSU.L
JPGL.L
Communication Services
BBSU.L
JPGL.L
Consumer Cyclical
BBSU.L
JPGL.L
Healthcare
BBSU.L
JPGL.L
Industrials
BBSU.L
JPGL.L
Consumer Defensive
BBSU.L
JPGL.L
Energy
BBSU.L
JPGL.L
Utilities
BBSU.L
JPGL.L
Real Estate
BBSU.L
JPGL.L
Basic Materials
BBSU.L
JPGL.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBSU.L vs. JPGL.L — Risk / Return Rank
BBSU.L
JPGL.L
BBSU.L vs. JPGL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) and JPM Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (JPGL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBSU.L | JPGL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.43 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | 3.99 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.74 | 15.49 | -2.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBSU.L | JPGL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70 | 2.39 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 0.84 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.64 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
BBSU.L vs. JPGL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBSU.L drawdown since its inception was -25.80%, smaller than the maximum JPGL.L drawdown of -28.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSU.L and JPGL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBSU.L | JPGL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.80% | -28.18% | +2.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.80% | -5.75% | -2.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.42% | -13.93% | -7.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.42% | -13.93% | -7.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | 0.00% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -3.37% | -0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 1.48% | +0.76% |
Volatility
BBSU.L vs. JPGL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) is 2.64%, while JPM Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Acc (JPGL.L) has a volatility of 2.80%. This indicates that BBSU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPGL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBSU.L | JPGL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 2.80% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.21% | 7.48% | -0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.54% | 9.58% | +0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 12.31% | +2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.10% | 15.03% | +1.07% |
BBSU.L vs. JPGL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBSU.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than JPGL.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBSU.L vs. JPGL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BBSU.L nor JPGL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BBSU.L and JPGL.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BBSU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBSU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for JPGL.L.
BBSU.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while JPGL.L is Global Equities. BBSU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while JPGL.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for BBSU.L and 0.19% for JPGL.L.
Find the right allocation for BBSU.L and JPGL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer