BBSU.L vs. HMUD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BBSU.L (JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc)) and HMUD.L (HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from JPMorgan and HSBC respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBSU.L returned 14.50%/yr vs 13.48%/yr for HMUD.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBSU.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for HMUD.L.

Performance

BBSU.L vs. HMUD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) and HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

BBSU.L is traded in GBp, while HMUD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HMUD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBSU.L achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly higher than HMUD.L's 9.40% return.

BBSU.L

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 5.58%
• YTD: 10.31%
• 6M: 10.11%
• 1Y: 28.62%
• 3Y*: 19.09%
• 5Y*: 14.50%
• 10Y*: —

HMUD.L

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 5.73%
• YTD: 9.40%
• 6M: 8.96%
• 1Y: 23.25%
• 3Y*: 17.49%
• 5Y*: 13.48%
• 10Y*: 15.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBSU.L vs. HMUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BBSU.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc)	10.31%	9.39%	27.19%	20.71%	-10.46%	29.25%	16.07%	11.91%
HMUD.L HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF	9.40%	5.78%	27.24%	21.09%	-10.74%	28.57%	17.17%	11.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BBSU.L and HMUD.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019	0.93

The correlation between BBSU.L and HMUD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BBSU.L vs. HMUD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBSU.L

BBSU.L Risk / Return Rank: 79
BBSU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BBSU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
BBSU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
BBSU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
BBSU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 69

HMUD.L

HMUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 61
HMUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
HMUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
HMUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 60
HMUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
HMUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBSU.L vs. HMUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) and HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBSU.L	HMUD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.70	2.04	+0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.60	2.83	+0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.37	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.65	3.41	+0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.74	12.02	+0.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBSU.L vs. HMUD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBSU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the HMUD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBSU.L and HMUD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBSU.L	HMUD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.70	2.04	+0.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00	0.87	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	0.95	0.00

Drawdowns

BBSU.L vs. HMUD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBSU.L drawdown since its inception was -25.80%, roughly equal to the maximum HMUD.L drawdown of -26.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSU.L and HMUD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBSU.L	HMUD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.80%	-26.43%	+0.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.80%	-6.80%	-1.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.42%	-21.51%	+0.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.42%	-21.51%	+0.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-26.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	0.00%	-0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.72%	-3.54%	-0.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	1.93%	+0.31%

Volatility

BBSU.L vs. HMUD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) is 2.64%, while HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF (HMUD.L) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that BBSU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HMUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBSU.L	HMUD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.64%	3.33%	-0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.21%	8.31%	-1.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.54%	11.33%	-0.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.45%	15.54%	-1.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.10%	16.58%	-0.48%

BBSU.L vs. HMUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBSU.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than HMUD.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBSU.L vs. HMUD.L - Dividend Comparison

BBSU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HMUD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBSU.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HMUD.L HSBC MSCI USA UCITS ETF	0.91%	0.95%	0.82%	0.97%	1.07%	0.78%	1.11%	1.22%	1.45%	1.24%	1.43%	1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBSU.L and HMUD.L in my portfolio?

BBSU.L and HMUD.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BBSU.L or HMUD.L?

On fees, BBSU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBSU.L or HMUD.L?

BBSU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HMUD.L.

What is the main difference between BBSU.L and HMUD.L?

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for BBSU.L and 0.30% for HMUD.L.