BBSU.L vs. DGRG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BBSU.L (JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc)) and DGRG.L (WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - BBSU.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while DGRG.L tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBSU.L returned 14.50%/yr vs 12.91%/yr for DGRG.L. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBSU.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for DGRG.L.

Performance

BBSU.L vs. DGRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (DGRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBSU.L achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly higher than DGRG.L's 6.87% return.

BBSU.L

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 5.58%
• YTD: 10.31%
• 6M: 10.11%
• 1Y: 28.62%
• 3Y*: 19.09%
• 5Y*: 14.50%
• 10Y*: —

DGRG.L

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 4.47%
• YTD: 6.87%
• 6M: 6.31%
• 1Y: 21.18%
• 3Y*: 13.50%
• 5Y*: 12.91%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBSU.L vs. DGRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BBSU.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc)	10.31%	9.39%	27.19%	20.71%	-10.46%	29.25%	16.07%	11.91%
DGRG.L WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc	6.87%	5.60%	20.13%	12.11%	2.74%	26.71%	8.76%	11.38%

Correlation

The correlation between BBSU.L and DGRG.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019	0.91

The correlation between BBSU.L and DGRG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBSU.L vs. DGRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BBSU.L	DGRG.L
Technology	35.4%	30.4%
Financial Services	11.8%	10.3%
Communication Services	11.5%	8.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	8.2%
Healthcare	8.6%	15.3%
Industrials	8.4%	10.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	8.0%
Energy	3.6%	5.2%
Utilities	2.3%	0.3%
Real Estate	1.8%	-
Basic Materials	1.7%	3.1%

Return for Risk

BBSU.L vs. DGRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBSU.L

BBSU.L Risk / Return Rank: 79
BBSU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BBSU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
BBSU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
BBSU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
BBSU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 69

DGRG.L

DGRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
DGRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
DGRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
DGRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 74
DGRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
DGRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBSU.L vs. DGRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (DGRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBSU.L	DGRG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.70	2.38	+0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.60	3.32	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.43	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.65	3.53	+0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.74	12.98	-0.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBSU.L vs. DGRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBSU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the DGRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBSU.L and DGRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBSU.L	DGRG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.70	2.38	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00	1.03	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	1.01	-0.05

Drawdowns

BBSU.L vs. DGRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBSU.L drawdown since its inception was -25.80%, which is greater than DGRG.L's maximum drawdown of -22.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSU.L and DGRG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBSU.L	DGRG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.80%	-22.57%	-3.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.80%	-5.98%	-1.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.42%	-17.72%	-3.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.42%	-17.72%	-3.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	0.00%	-0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.72%	-2.96%	-0.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	1.63%	+0.61%

Volatility

BBSU.L vs. DGRG.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) has a higher volatility of 2.64% compared to WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (DGRG.L) at 2.40%. This indicates that BBSU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBSU.L	DGRG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.64%	2.40%	+0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.21%	6.19%	+1.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.54%	8.86%	+1.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.45%	12.55%	+1.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.10%	14.45%	+1.65%

BBSU.L vs. DGRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBSU.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRG.L's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBSU.L vs. DGRG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BBSU.L nor DGRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBSU.L and DGRG.L in my portfolio?

BBSU.L and DGRG.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BBSU.L or DGRG.L?

On fees, BBSU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBSU.L or DGRG.L?

BBSU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for DGRG.L.

What is the main difference between BBSU.L and DGRG.L?

BBSU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while DGRG.L tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for BBSU.L and 0.33% for DGRG.L.