BBSU.L vs. DGRA.L
BBSU.L (JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc)) and DGRA.L (WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - BBSU.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD while DGRA.L tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBSU.L returned 14.50%/yr vs 12.91%/yr for DGRA.L. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBSU.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for DGRA.L.
Performance
BBSU.L vs. DGRA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BBSU.L is traded in GBp, while DGRA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DGRA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBSU.L achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly higher than DGRA.L's 7.19% return.
BBSU.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 10.31%
- 6M
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- 28.62%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- 14.50%
- 10Y*
- —
DGRA.L
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 4.46%
- YTD
- 7.19%
- 6M
- 5.39%
- 1Y
- 21.06%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 12.91%
- 10Y*
- —
BBSU.L vs. DGRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBSU.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) | 10.31% | 9.39% | 27.19% | 20.71% | -10.46% | 29.25% | 16.07% | 11.91% |
DGRA.L WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc | 7.19% | 5.03% | 20.29% | 12.77% | 2.58% | 26.46% | 9.27% | 10.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBSU.L and DGRA.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019 | 0.85 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BBSU.L and DGRA.L has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
BBSU.L vs. DGRA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBSU.L
DGRA.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
BBSU.L
DGRA.L
Financial Services
BBSU.L
DGRA.L
Communication Services
BBSU.L
DGRA.L
Consumer Cyclical
BBSU.L
DGRA.L
Healthcare
BBSU.L
DGRA.L
Industrials
BBSU.L
DGRA.L
Consumer Defensive
BBSU.L
DGRA.L
Energy
BBSU.L
DGRA.L
Utilities
BBSU.L
DGRA.L
Real Estate
BBSU.L
DGRA.L
-
Basic Materials
BBSU.L
DGRA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBSU.L vs. DGRA.L — Risk / Return Rank
BBSU.L
DGRA.L
BBSU.L vs. DGRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBSU.L | DGRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.34 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | 3.77 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.74 | 12.10 | +0.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBSU.L | DGRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70 | 1.85 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 0.92 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.94 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
BBSU.L vs. DGRA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBSU.L drawdown since its inception was -25.80%, which is greater than DGRA.L's maximum drawdown of -23.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSU.L and DGRA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBSU.L | DGRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.80% | -23.29% | -2.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.80% | -5.57% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.42% | -18.00% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.42% | -18.00% | -3.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | 0.00% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -2.98% | -0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 1.74% | +0.50% |
Volatility
BBSU.L vs. DGRA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) is 2.64%, while WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L) has a volatility of 3.18%. This indicates that BBSU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBSU.L | DGRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 3.18% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.21% | 8.41% | -1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.54% | 11.31% | -0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 14.01% | +0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.10% | 15.54% | +0.56% |
BBSU.L vs. DGRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBSU.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRA.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBSU.L vs. DGRA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BBSU.L nor DGRA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BBSU.L and DGRA.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BBSU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBSU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for DGRA.L.
BBSU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while DGRA.L tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for BBSU.L and 0.33% for DGRA.L.
Find the right allocation for BBSU.L and DGRA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer