PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBSU.L vs. DGRA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBSU.L vs. DGRA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BBSU.L is traded in GBp, while DGRA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DGRA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBSU.L achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly higher than DGRA.L's 7.19% return.


BBSU.L

1D
0.07%
1M
5.58%
YTD
10.31%
6M
10.11%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
14.50%
10Y*

DGRA.L

1D
0.12%
1M
4.46%
YTD
7.19%
6M
5.39%
1Y
21.06%
3Y*
13.50%
5Y*
12.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBSU.L vs. DGRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BBSU.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc)
10.31%9.39%27.19%20.71%-10.46%29.25%16.07%11.91%
DGRA.L
WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc
7.19%5.03%20.29%12.77%2.58%26.46%9.27%10.81%

Correlation

The correlation between BBSU.L and DGRA.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between BBSU.L and DGRA.L has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BBSU.L vs. DGRA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBSU.L
DGRA.L

Technology

35.4%
28.9%

Financial Services

11.8%
10.7%

Communication Services

11.5%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
8.5%

Healthcare

8.6%
15.0%

Industrials

8.4%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
8.2%

Energy

3.6%
5.3%

Utilities

2.3%
0.4%

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%
3.1%

Technology

BBSU.L
35.4%
DGRA.L
28.9%

Financial Services

BBSU.L
11.8%
DGRA.L
10.7%

Communication Services

BBSU.L
11.5%
DGRA.L
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

BBSU.L
10.1%
DGRA.L
8.5%

Healthcare

BBSU.L
8.6%
DGRA.L
15.0%

Industrials

BBSU.L
8.4%
DGRA.L
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

BBSU.L
4.8%
DGRA.L
8.2%

Energy

BBSU.L
3.6%
DGRA.L
5.3%

Utilities

BBSU.L
2.3%
DGRA.L
0.4%

Real Estate

BBSU.L
1.8%
DGRA.L

-

Basic Materials

BBSU.L
1.7%
DGRA.L
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBSU.L vs. DGRA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBSU.L
BBSU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BBSU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBSU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBSU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
BBSU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBSU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRA.L
DGRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DGRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBSU.L vs. DGRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBSU.LDGRA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.34

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

3.77

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.74

12.10

+0.64

BBSU.L vs. DGRA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBSU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the DGRA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBSU.L and DGRA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBSU.LDGRA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

1.85

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.92

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.94

+0.02

Drawdowns

BBSU.L vs. DGRA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBSU.L drawdown since its inception was -25.80%, which is greater than DGRA.L's maximum drawdown of -23.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSU.L and DGRA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBSU.LDGRA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.80%

-23.29%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.80%

-5.57%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.42%

-18.00%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.42%

-18.00%

-3.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

0.00%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-2.98%

-0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

1.74%

+0.50%

Volatility

BBSU.L vs. DGRA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) is 2.64%, while WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L) has a volatility of 3.18%. This indicates that BBSU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBSU.LDGRA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

3.18%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.21%

8.41%

-1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.54%

11.31%

-0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

14.01%

+0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.10%

15.54%

+0.56%

BBSU.L vs. DGRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBSU.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRA.L's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBSU.L vs. DGRA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BBSU.L nor DGRA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BBSU.L and DGRA.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BBSU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBSU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for DGRA.L.

BBSU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while DGRA.L tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for BBSU.L and 0.33% for DGRA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBSU.L and DGRA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer