BBSOX vs. CBUDX
BBSOX (BlackRock Short Obligations Fund) and CBUDX (CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration Fund) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 3 years, BBSOX returned 4.77%/yr vs 5.39%/yr for CBUDX. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBSOX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for CBUDX.
Performance
BBSOX vs. CBUDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BBSOX having a 1.49% return and CBUDX slightly higher at 1.54%.
BBSOX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 4.24%
- 3Y*
- 4.77%
- 5Y*
- 3.27%
- 10Y*
- 2.48%
CBUDX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 2.19%
- 1Y
- 4.64%
- 3Y*
- 5.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBSOX vs. CBUDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBSOX BlackRock Short Obligations Fund | 1.49% | 4.74% | 5.36% | 4.36% | 0.60% | -0.12% |
CBUDX CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration Fund | 1.54% | 5.25% | 5.83% | 5.61% | 2.25% | 0.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBSOX and CBUDX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBSOX vs. CBUDX — Risk / Return Rank
BBSOX
CBUDX
BBSOX vs. CBUDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Short Obligations Fund (BBSOX) and CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration Fund (CBUDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBSOX | CBUDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.20 | 5.66 | -2.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 11.68 | 10.83 | +0.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.23 | 4.63 | -0.40 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 23.44 | 11.85 | +11.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 76.77 | 80.67 | -3.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBSOX | CBUDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.20 | 5.66 | -2.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 2.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.24 | 4.62 | -2.38 |
Drawdowns
BBSOX vs. CBUDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBSOX drawdown since its inception was -1.59%, which is greater than CBUDX's maximum drawdown of -0.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSOX and CBUDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBSOX | CBUDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.59% | -0.40% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.20% | -0.40% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.30% | -0.40% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -1.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -0.03% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.00% |
Volatility
BBSOX vs. CBUDX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Short Obligations Fund (BBSOX) has a higher volatility of 0.40% compared to CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration Fund (CBUDX) at 0.26%. This indicates that BBSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBUDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBSOX | CBUDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.40% | 0.26% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.94% | 0.68% | +0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33% | 0.84% | +0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.25% | 0.92% | +0.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.03% | 0.92% | +0.11% |
BBSOX vs. CBUDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBSOX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than CBUDX's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBSOX vs. CBUDX - Dividend Comparison
BBSOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, less than CBUDX's 4.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBSOX BlackRock Short Obligations Fund | 4.25% | 4.43% | 5.01% | 3.35% | 1.29% | 0.30% | 1.13% | 2.56% | 2.24% | 1.17% | 1.03% | 0.62% |
CBUDX CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration Fund | 4.45% | 4.61% | 5.68% | 5.67% | 2.94% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBSOX and CBUDX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBSOX has higher volatility (0.40%) compared to CBUDX (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBSOX dropped -1.59% vs CBUDX's -0.40%.
CBUDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.66 vs 3.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBSOX and CBUDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer