BBSC vs. BITI

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

BBSC (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBSC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BBSC returned 16.12%/yr vs -31.71%/yr for BITI. At a correlation of -0.42, they often move in opposite directions. BBSC charges 0.09%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

BBSC vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBSC achieves a 21.58% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 24.73% return.

BBSC

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 3.11%
• 6M: 13.82%
• YTD: 21.58%
• 1Y: 32.39%
• 3Y*: 16.12%
• 5Y*: 8.80%
• 10Y*: —

BITI

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -0.52%
• 6M: 36.51%
• YTD: 24.73%
• 1Y: 64.56%
• 3Y*: -31.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBSC vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BBSC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF	21.58%	10.38%	12.31%	20.07%	6.35%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	24.73%	-1.76%	-62.60%	-66.17%	3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between BBSC and BITI is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022	-0.42

Return for Risk

BBSC vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBSC

BBSC Risk / Return Rank: 72
BBSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BBSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
BBSC Omega Ratio Rank: 62
BBSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
BBSC Martin Ratio Rank: 77

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 53
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 47
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBSC vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBSC	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	1.47	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	2.04	+0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.25	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.41	2.57	+0.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.10	6.36	+4.74

BBSC vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBSC Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBSC and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BBSC vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBSC drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSC and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBSC	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.96%	-92.16%	+61.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.54%	-25.28%	+15.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.32%	-84.63%	+55.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.05%	-86.38%	+84.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.26%	-68.42%	+57.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.93%	10.18%	-7.25%

Volatility

BBSC vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) is 3.62%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 10.69%. This indicates that BBSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBSC	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.62%	10.69%	-7.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.34%	34.09%	-20.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.02%	44.07%	-25.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.92%	52.21%	-29.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.74%	52.21%	-29.47%

BBSC vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBSC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBSC vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

BBSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than BITI's 15.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BBSC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF	1.00%	1.13%	1.29%	1.58%	1.37%	1.06%	0.18%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.59%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBSC and BITI in my portfolio?

BBSC and BITI have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBSC or BITI?

BITI has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to BBSC (3.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBSC dropped -30.96% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, BBSC or BITI?

On 3-year performance, BBSC leads with 16.12% vs -31.71% for BITI. On fees, BBSC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, BBSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBSC or BITI?

Over the 3-year period, BBSC has performed better with a 16.12% return vs -31.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBSC or BITI?

BBSC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBSC or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.59%, compared with 1.00% for BBSC.

What is the main difference between BBSC and BITI?

BBSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. BBSC tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for BBSC and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.