PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBRE vs. URE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBRE vs. URE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE) and ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBRE achieves a 17.09% return, which is significantly lower than URE's 20.03% return.


BBRE

1D
0.17%
1M
2.09%
YTD
17.09%
6M
16.78%
1Y
17.71%
3Y*
13.72%
5Y*
5.13%
10Y*

URE

1D
-1.05%
1M
0.19%
YTD
20.03%
6M
19.27%
1Y
8.98%
3Y*
12.32%
5Y*
-3.35%
10Y*
3.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBRE vs. URE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BBRE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF
17.09%2.09%8.24%13.85%-24.68%42.99%-7.55%26.06%-2.41%
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
20.03%-3.65%0.35%11.58%-49.64%88.24%-28.06%57.86%-8.56%

Correlation

The correlation between BBRE and URE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2018

0.95

The correlation between BBRE and URE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBRE vs. URE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBRE
BBRE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
BBRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBRE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BBRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBRE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

URE
URE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
URE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
URE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
URE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
URE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBRE vs. URE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE) and ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBREUREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.08

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

0.55

+1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.01

1.33

+5.68

BBRE vs. URE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBRE Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the URE Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBRE and URE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBRE vs. URE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBRE drawdown since its inception was -43.61%, smaller than the maximum URE drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBRE and URE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBREUREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.61%

-97.16%

+53.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.07%

-16.50%

+8.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.92%

-33.77%

+14.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.15%

-63.66%

+32.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-50.16%

+50.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.45%

-64.47%

+54.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

6.87%

-4.30%

Volatility

BBRE vs. URE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE) is 5.32%, while ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) has a volatility of 10.70%. This indicates that BBRE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBREUREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

10.70%

-5.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

21.29%

-11.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.97%

28.06%

-14.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.82%

37.44%

-18.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.54%

40.63%

-18.09%

BBRE vs. URE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBRE has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than URE's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBRE vs. URE - Dividend Comparison

BBRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than URE's 1.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBRE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF
2.65%3.24%3.19%3.68%2.62%1.70%3.17%2.19%1.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
1.95%2.42%2.09%1.32%1.26%0.58%0.94%1.10%1.53%0.93%0.96%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, BBRE and URE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

URE has higher volatility (10.70%) compared to BBRE (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBRE dropped -43.61% vs URE's -97.16%.

On 5-year performance, BBRE leads with 5.13% vs -3.35% for URE. On fees, BBRE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, BBRE has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBRE has performed better with a 5.13% return vs -3.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBRE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for URE.

BBRE has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 1.95% for URE.

BBRE tracks MSCI US REIT Index, while URE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for BBRE and 0.95% for URE.

BBRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBRE and URE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer