BBRE vs. DFAR
BBRE (JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF) and DFAR (Dimensional US Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. BBRE is passively managed, while DFAR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BBRE returned 10.99%/yr vs 9.64%/yr for DFAR. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BBRE charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for DFAR.
Performance
BBRE vs. DFAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BBRE having a 11.77% return and DFAR slightly lower at 11.46%.
BBRE
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 11.77%
- 6M
- 10.56%
- 1Y
- 14.11%
- 3Y*
- 10.99%
- 5Y*
- 4.42%
- 10Y*
- —
DFAR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- 11.46%
- 6M
- 10.41%
- 1Y
- 11.45%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBRE vs. DFAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBRE JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF | 11.77% | 2.09% | 8.24% | 13.85% | -15.50% |
DFAR Dimensional US Real Estate ETF | 11.46% | 1.31% | 5.25% | 11.04% | -14.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBRE and DFAR is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.98 |
The correlation between BBRE and DFAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
BBRE vs. DFAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBRE
DFAR
Real Estate
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
BBRE
DFAR
Financial Services
BBRE
DFAR
Basic Materials
BBRE
-
DFAR
-
Communication Services
BBRE
-
DFAR
-
Consumer Cyclical
BBRE
-
DFAR
-
Consumer Defensive
BBRE
-
DFAR
-
Energy
BBRE
-
DFAR
-
Healthcare
BBRE
-
DFAR
-
Industrials
BBRE
-
DFAR
-
Technology
BBRE
-
DFAR
-
Utilities
BBRE
-
DFAR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBRE vs. DFAR — Risk / Return Rank
BBRE
DFAR
BBRE vs. DFAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE) and Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBRE | DFAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 0.88 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | 1.25 | +0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.16 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 1.36 | +0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.54 | 4.29 | +1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBRE | DFAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 0.88 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.15 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
BBRE vs. DFAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBRE drawdown since its inception was -43.61%, which is greater than DFAR's maximum drawdown of -32.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBRE and DFAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBRE | DFAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.61% | -32.27% | -11.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.07% | -8.43% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.92% | -17.64% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.12% | -3.01% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.53% | -14.22% | +3.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 2.67% | -0.12% |
Volatility
BBRE vs. DFAR - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF (BBRE) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) at 3.71%. This indicates that BBRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBRE | DFAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 3.71% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.47% | 9.40% | +0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.39% | 13.10% | +0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.77% | 19.13% | -0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.56% | 19.13% | +3.43% |
BBRE vs. DFAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBRE has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAR's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBRE vs. DFAR - Dividend Comparison
BBRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than DFAR's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBRE JPMorgan BetaBuilders MSCI US REIT ETF | 2.81% | 3.24% | 3.19% | 3.68% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 3.17% | 2.19% | 1.96% |
DFAR Dimensional US Real Estate ETF | 2.77% | 2.97% | 2.89% | 3.06% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, BBRE and DFAR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BBRE has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to DFAR (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBRE dropped -43.61% vs DFAR's -32.27%.
On 3-year performance, BBRE leads with 10.99% vs 9.64% for DFAR. On fees, BBRE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, DFAR has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BBRE has performed better with a 10.99% return vs 9.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBRE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for DFAR.
BBRE has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 2.77% for DFAR.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for BBRE and 0.19% for DFAR.
BBRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBRE and DFAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer