BBN vs. CLOZ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Taxable Municipal Bond Trust (BBN) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ).

BBN is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 27, 2010. CLOZ is an actively managed fund by Panagram. It was launched on Jan 23, 2023.

Performance

BBN vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Taxable Municipal Bond Trust (BBN) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BBN vs. CLOZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BBN BlackRock Taxable Municipal Bond Trust	0.77%	8.59%	6.01%	-2.92%
CLOZ Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF	-1.42%	5.99%	11.85%	14.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBN achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly higher than CLOZ's -1.42% return.

BBN

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -2.58%
• YTD: 0.77%
• 6M: 0.28%
• 1Y: 4.41%
• 3Y*: 3.52%
• 5Y*: -1.71%
• 10Y*: 3.08%

CLOZ

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 0.79%
• YTD: -1.42%
• 6M: -0.20%
• 1Y: 4.67%
• 3Y*: 9.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBN vs. CLOZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBN has a 2.32% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOZ's 0.50% expense ratio.

BBN

BlackRock Taxable Municipal Bond Trust

CLOZ

Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF

Return for Risk

BBN vs. CLOZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBN

BBN Risk / Return Rank: 12
BBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
BBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
BBN Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
BBN Martin Ratio Rank: 10

CLOZ

CLOZ Risk / Return Rank: 46
CLOZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
CLOZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
CLOZ Omega Ratio Rank: 64
CLOZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
CLOZ Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBN vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Taxable Municipal Bond Trust (BBN) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBN	CLOZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.42	0.85	-0.43
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.64	1.13	-0.49
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.24	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.53	1.23	-0.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.14	3.89	-2.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBN vs. CLOZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBN Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the CLOZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBN and CLOZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBN	CLOZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42	0.85	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	2.55	-2.15

Correlation

The correlation between BBN and CLOZ is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

BBN vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

BBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%, less than CLOZ's 7.93% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBN BlackRock Taxable Municipal Bond Trust	7.19%	7.01%	6.92%	7.16%	7.91%	5.45%	5.05%	5.66%	7.09%	6.82%	7.32%	7.54%
CLOZ Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF	7.93%	7.63%	9.09%	8.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BBN vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBN drawdown since its inception was -38.37%, which is greater than CLOZ's maximum drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBN and CLOZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBN	CLOZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.37%	-5.32%	-33.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.55%	-3.90%	-3.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.37%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.47%	-2.66%	-15.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.23%	-0.37%	-9.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.48%	1.23%	+2.25%

Volatility

BBN vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Taxable Municipal Bond Trust (BBN) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) at 1.37%. This indicates that BBN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBN	CLOZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.08%	1.37%	+2.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.93%	2.94%	+3.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.55%	5.50%	+5.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.54%	3.83%	+11.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.13%	3.83%	+11.30%