BBMUX vs. BBVLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Bridge Builder Municipal Bond Fund (BBMUX) and Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund (BBVLX).
BBMUX is managed by Bridge Builder. It was launched on Sep 13, 2015. BBVLX is managed by Bridge Builder. It was launched on Apr 27, 2015.
Performance
BBMUX vs. BBVLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BBMUX vs. BBVLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBMUX Bridge Builder Municipal Bond Fund | -0.72% | 5.10% | 1.50% | 5.56% | -8.23% | 2.04% | 4.01% | 7.15% | 1.49% | 4.75% |
BBVLX Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund | -1.42% | 4.45% | 22.32% | 13.84% | -5.32% | 26.23% | 9.57% | 28.49% | -8.15% | 17.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBMUX achieves a -0.72% return, which is significantly higher than BBVLX's -1.42% return. Over the past 10 years, BBMUX has underperformed BBVLX with an annualized return of 1.93%, while BBVLX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.30% annualized return.
BBMUX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- -0.72%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 3.86%
- 3Y*
- 2.94%
- 5Y*
- 0.89%
- 10Y*
- 1.93%
BBVLX
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -5.62%
- YTD
- -1.42%
- 6M
- -6.02%
- 1Y
- 2.43%
- 3Y*
- 12.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.82%
- 10Y*
- 11.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BBMUX vs. BBVLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBMUX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BBVLX's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
BBMUX vs. BBVLX — Risk / Return Rank
BBMUX
BBVLX
BBMUX vs. BBVLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Municipal Bond Fund (BBMUX) and Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund (BBVLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBMUX | BBVLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 0.15 | +1.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 0.31 | +1.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.05 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 0.12 | +0.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.88 | 0.35 | +3.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBMUX | BBVLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 0.15 | +1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.55 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.63 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.57 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between BBMUX and BBVLX is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
BBMUX vs. BBVLX - Dividend Comparison
BBMUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, more than BBVLX's 1.41% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBMUX Bridge Builder Municipal Bond Fund | 3.06% | 3.61% | 2.81% | 2.21% | 1.82% | 1.93% | 2.10% | 2.61% | 2.35% | 1.95% | 0.35% | 0.06% |
BBVLX Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund | 1.41% | 1.89% | 14.73% | 5.11% | 9.12% | 7.09% | 1.62% | 1.80% | 3.45% | 2.23% | 1.68% | 1.24% |
Drawdowns
BBMUX vs. BBVLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBMUX drawdown since its inception was -12.65%, smaller than the maximum BBVLX drawdown of -38.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBMUX and BBVLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBMUX | BBVLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.65% | -38.48% | +25.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.64% | -11.42% | +7.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.65% | -18.24% | +5.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.65% | -38.48% | +25.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.56% | -9.82% | +7.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.28% | -4.10% | +1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 4.22% | -3.20% |
Volatility
BBMUX vs. BBVLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bridge Builder Municipal Bond Fund (BBMUX) is 0.95%, while Bridge Builder Large Cap Value Fund (BBVLX) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that BBMUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBVLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BBMUX | BBVLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.95% | 4.19% | -3.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.55% | 10.91% | -9.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76% | 17.26% | -13.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.21% | 16.29% | -13.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.23% | 17.94% | -14.71% |