BBMC vs. JPST
BBMC (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF) and JPST (JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBMC is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while JPST is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by JPMorgan. BBMC is passively managed, while JPST is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBMC returned 8.32%/yr vs 3.61%/yr for JPST. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBMC charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for JPST.
Performance
BBMC vs. JPST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBMC achieves a 16.66% return, which is significantly higher than JPST's 1.40% return.
BBMC
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- 16.66%
- 6M
- 16.84%
- 1Y
- 33.04%
- 3Y*
- 19.56%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- —
JPST
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 4.31%
- 3Y*
- 5.16%
- 5Y*
- 3.61%
- 10Y*
- —
BBMC vs. JPST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBMC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF | 16.66% | 12.24% | 15.15% | 18.37% | -19.77% | 17.64% | 61.98% |
JPST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF | 1.40% | 4.99% | 5.58% | 5.13% | 1.14% | 0.11% | 2.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBMC and JPST is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2020 | 0.12 |
The correlation between BBMC and JPST shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BBMC vs. JPST - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBMC
JPST
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Technology
BBMC
JPST
Industrials
BBMC
JPST
Consumer Cyclical
BBMC
JPST
Financial Services
BBMC
JPST
Healthcare
BBMC
JPST
Real Estate
BBMC
JPST
Basic Materials
BBMC
JPST
Consumer Defensive
BBMC
JPST
Energy
BBMC
JPST
Utilities
BBMC
JPST
Communication Services
BBMC
JPST
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBMC vs. JPST — Risk / Return Rank
BBMC
JPST
BBMC vs. JPST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBMC | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -14.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 3.94 | -2.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 29.16 | -25.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.41 | 144.13 | -130.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBMC | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | 8.09 | -6.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 6.32 | -5.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 3.20 | -2.36 |
Drawdowns
BBMC vs. JPST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBMC drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, which is greater than JPST's maximum drawdown of -3.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBMC and JPST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBMC | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.11% | -3.28% | -26.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.75% | -0.15% | -9.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.18% | -0.30% | -23.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.11% | -0.79% | -29.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.02% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.92% | -0.08% | -8.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 0.03% | +2.44% |
Volatility
BBMC vs. JPST - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) at 0.15%. This indicates that BBMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBMC | JPST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 0.15% | +4.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.14% | 0.36% | +11.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.32% | 0.54% | +15.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.59% | 0.58% | +20.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.08% | 0.93% | +20.15% |
BBMC vs. JPST - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBMC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than JPST's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBMC vs. JPST - Dividend Comparison
BBMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than JPST's 4.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBMC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF | 1.09% | 1.25% | 1.31% | 1.36% | 1.48% | 0.87% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JPST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF | 4.26% | 4.43% | 5.16% | 4.79% | 1.83% | 0.73% | 1.43% | 2.69% | 2.07% | 0.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBMC and JPST have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBMC has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to JPST (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBMC dropped -30.11% vs JPST's -3.28%.
On 5-year performance, BBMC leads with 8.32% vs 3.61% for JPST. On fees, BBMC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, JPST has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBMC has performed better with a 8.32% return vs 3.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBMC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JPST.
JPST has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 1.09% for BBMC.
BBMC is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while JPST is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBMC and 0.18% for JPST.
JPST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.09 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBMC and JPST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer