PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBMC vs. GRPZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BBMC vs. GRPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BBMC vs. GRPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BBMC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
2.89%12.24%5.53%
GRPZ
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF
3.76%3.09%4.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBMC achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly lower than GRPZ's 3.76% return.


BBMC

1D
0.98%
1M
-5.33%
YTD
2.89%
6M
5.60%
1Y
22.25%
3Y*
14.78%
5Y*
6.07%
10Y*

GRPZ

1D
0.61%
1M
-3.48%
YTD
3.76%
6M
3.27%
1Y
17.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BBMC vs. GRPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBMC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GRPZ's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BBMC vs. GRPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBMC
BBMC Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
BBMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBMC Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BBMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBMC Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

GRPZ
GRPZ Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
GRPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GRPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBMC vs. GRPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBMCGRPZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.04

0.78

+0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.56

1.27

+0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.16

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

1.29

+0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.94

4.57

+2.38

BBMC vs. GRPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is higher than the GRPZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBMC and GRPZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBMCGRPZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

0.78

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.26

+0.49

Correlation

The correlation between BBMC and GRPZ is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BBMC vs. GRPZ - Dividend Comparison

BBMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than GRPZ's 0.97% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
BBMC
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.24%1.25%1.31%1.36%1.48%0.87%0.69%
GRPZ
Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF
0.97%0.97%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BBMC vs. GRPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBMC drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, which is greater than GRPZ's maximum drawdown of -27.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBMC and GRPZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BBMCGRPZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.11%

-27.87%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.24%

-14.12%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.90%

-6.27%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.14%

-7.42%

-1.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

4.00%

-0.68%

Volatility

BBMC vs. GRPZ - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) at 5.73%. This indicates that BBMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BBMCGRPZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.78%

5.73%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.75%

12.71%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.57%

22.52%

-0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.55%

21.58%

-1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.20%

21.58%

-0.38%