BBMC vs. BKSE
BBMC (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF) and BKSE (BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - BBMC tracks the Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index while BKSE tracks the Morningstar US Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBMC returned 8.32%/yr vs 6.89%/yr for BKSE. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BBMC charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BKSE.
Performance
BBMC vs. BKSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBMC achieves a 16.66% return, which is significantly higher than BKSE's 13.03% return.
BBMC
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- 16.66%
- 6M
- 16.84%
- 1Y
- 33.04%
- 3Y*
- 19.56%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- —
BKSE
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 13.03%
- 6M
- 12.11%
- 1Y
- 32.65%
- 3Y*
- 17.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.89%
- 10Y*
- —
BBMC vs. BKSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBMC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF | 16.66% | 12.24% | 15.15% | 18.37% | -19.77% | 17.64% | 61.98% |
BKSE BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF | 13.03% | 13.09% | 9.56% | 22.37% | -18.44% | 16.18% | 64.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBMC and BKSE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2020 | 0.97 |
The correlation between BBMC and BKSE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
BBMC vs. BKSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBMC
BKSE
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Technology
BBMC
BKSE
Industrials
BBMC
BKSE
Consumer Cyclical
BBMC
BKSE
Financial Services
BBMC
BKSE
Healthcare
BBMC
BKSE
Real Estate
BBMC
BKSE
Basic Materials
BBMC
BKSE
Consumer Defensive
BBMC
BKSE
Energy
BBMC
BKSE
Utilities
BBMC
BKSE
Communication Services
BBMC
BKSE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBMC vs. BKSE — Risk / Return Rank
BBMC
BKSE
BBMC vs. BKSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) and BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBMC | BKSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.32 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 3.49 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.41 | 12.15 | +1.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBMC | BKSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | 1.87 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.32 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.73 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
BBMC vs. BKSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBMC drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, roughly equal to the maximum BKSE drawdown of -29.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBMC and BKSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBMC | BKSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.11% | -29.08% | -1.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.75% | -9.40% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.18% | -26.76% | +2.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.11% | -29.08% | -1.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -1.11% | +0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.92% | -9.06% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.47% | 2.69% | -0.22% |
Volatility
BBMC vs. BKSE - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) at 4.47%. This indicates that BBMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBMC | BKSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 4.47% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.14% | 11.96% | +0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.32% | 17.63% | -1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.59% | 21.43% | -0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.08% | 22.30% | -1.22% |
BBMC vs. BKSE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBMC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BKSE's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBMC vs. BKSE - Dividend Comparison
BBMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than BKSE's 1.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBMC JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF | 1.09% | 1.25% | 1.31% | 1.36% | 1.48% | 0.87% | 0.69% |
BKSE BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF | 1.16% | 1.26% | 1.55% | 1.38% | 1.50% | 1.17% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, BBMC and BKSE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BBMC has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to BKSE (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBMC dropped -30.11% vs BKSE's -29.08%.
On 5-year performance, BBMC leads with 8.32% vs 6.89% for BKSE. On fees, BKSE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKSE has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBMC has performed better with a 8.32% return vs 6.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKSE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for BBMC.
BKSE has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 1.09% for BBMC.
BBMC tracks Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended Index, while BKSE tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BBMC and 0.04% for BKSE.
BBMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBMC and BKSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer