PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBLB vs. VGSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBLB vs. VGSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF (BBLB) and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBLB achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly lower than VGSH's 0.48% return.


BBLB

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.77%
YTD
-0.36%
6M
-1.96%
1Y
5.09%
3Y*
-1.70%
5Y*
10Y*

VGSH

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.08%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.74%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
4.15%
5Y*
1.81%
10Y*
1.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBLB vs. VGSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BBLB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF
-0.36%4.26%-7.84%-2.91%
VGSH
Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF
0.48%5.07%4.00%2.58%

Correlation

The correlation between BBLB and VGSH is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2023

0.64

The correlation between BBLB and VGSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBLB vs. VGSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBLB
BBLB Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BBLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBLB Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
BBLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBLB Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

VGSH
VGSH Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
VGSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGSH Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
VGSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGSH Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBLB vs. VGSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF (BBLB) and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBLBVGSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.57

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

3.90

-3.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.70

15.52

-13.82

BBLB vs. VGSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBLB Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the VGSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBLB and VGSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBLBVGSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

2.68

-2.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.17

1.01

-1.18

Drawdowns

BBLB vs. VGSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBLB drawdown since its inception was -21.06%, which is greater than VGSH's maximum drawdown of -5.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBLB and VGSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBLBVGSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.06%

-5.70%

-15.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-0.88%

-6.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.95%

-0.97%

-17.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.93%

-0.29%

-8.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.94%

-0.60%

-8.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

0.22%

+2.78%

Volatility

BBLB vs. VGSH - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF (BBLB) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH) at 0.35%. This indicates that BBLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBLBVGSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

0.35%

+2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.55%

0.88%

+5.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.80%

1.29%

+8.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.83%

1.97%

+11.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.83%

1.57%

+12.26%

BBLB vs. VGSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBLB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than VGSH's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBLB vs. VGSH - Dividend Comparison

BBLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.00%, more than VGSH's 3.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBLB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF
5.00%5.03%5.34%2.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGSH
Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF
3.87%4.00%4.18%3.31%1.15%0.66%1.74%2.28%1.79%1.10%0.84%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBLB and VGSH have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBLB has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to VGSH (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBLB dropped -21.06% vs VGSH's -5.70%.

On 3-year performance, VGSH leads with 4.15% vs -1.70% for BBLB. On fees, VGSH is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VGSH has performed better with a 4.15% return vs -1.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGSH is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for BBLB.

BBLB has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 3.87% for VGSH.

BBLB tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while VGSH tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BBLB and 0.03% for VGSH.

VGSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBLB and VGSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer