BBLB vs. HELO
BBLB (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF) and HELO (JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBLB is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while HELO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by JPMorgan. BBLB is passively managed, while HELO is actively managed. Over the past year, BBLB returned -1.51% vs 10.81% for HELO. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BBLB charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HELO.
Performance
BBLB vs. HELO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBLB achieves a -2.53% return, which is significantly lower than HELO's 5.04% return.
BBLB
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- 6M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- -2.53%
- 1Y
- -1.51%
- 3Y*
- -0.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -2.81%
HELO
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- 6M
- 4.31%
- YTD
- 5.04%
- 1Y
- 10.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $43.45K | $41.67K | $60.66K | |
| $21.02M | $35.24M | $27.89M |
BBLB vs. HELO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BBLB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF | -2.53% | 4.26% | -7.84% | 13.09% |
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 5.04% | 7.82% | 18.05% | 5.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBLB and HELO is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBLB vs. HELO — Risk / Return Rank
BBLB
HELO
BBLB vs. HELO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF (BBLB) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBLB | HELO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.31 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 1.89 | -2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | 8.09 | -8.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBLB vs. HELO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBLB drawdown since its inception was -21.06%, which is greater than HELO's maximum drawdown of -10.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBLB and HELO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBLB | HELO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.06% | -10.89% | -10.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.76% | -5.76% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.92% | 0.00% | -10.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.94% | -1.16% | -7.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | 1.34% | +2.24% |
Volatility
BBLB vs. HELO - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF (BBLB) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) have volatilities of 2.67% and 2.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBLB | HELO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.67% | 2.70% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.95% | 5.28% | +1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.26% | 6.85% | +2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.62% | 7.98% | +5.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.62% | 7.98% | +5.64% |
BBLB vs. HELO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBLB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than HELO's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBLB vs. HELO - Dividend Comparison
BBLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, more than HELO's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BBLB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 20+ Year ETF | 4.99% | 5.03% | 5.34% | 2.82% |
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF | 0.62% | 0.67% | 0.60% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBLB and HELO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HELO has higher volatility (2.70%) compared to BBLB (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBLB dropped -21.06% vs HELO's -10.89%.
On 1-year performance, HELO leads with 10.81% vs -1.51% for BBLB. On fees, BBLB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HELO has performed better with a 10.81% return vs -1.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBLB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HELO.
BBLB has the higher dividend yield at 4.99%, compared with 0.62% for HELO.
BBLB is categorized as Government Bonds, while HELO is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BBLB and 0.50% for HELO.
HELO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBLB and HELO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer