BBIO vs. MRVL
BBIO (BridgeBio Pharma, Inc.) and MRVL (Marvell Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. BBIO operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while MRVL operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 5 years, BBIO returned 1.89%/yr vs 42.37%/yr for MRVL. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BBIO vs. MRVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBIO achieves a -11.92% return, which is significantly lower than MRVL's 240.32% return.
BBIO
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- -11.92%
- 6M
- -9.25%
- 1Y
- 74.44%
- 3Y*
- 61.48%
- 5Y*
- 1.89%
- 10Y*
- —
MRVL
- 1D
- 9.63%
- 1M
- 69.78%
- YTD
- 240.32%
- 6M
- 214.35%
- 1Y
- 323.75%
- 3Y*
- 69.41%
- 5Y*
- 42.37%
- 10Y*
- 41.26%
BBIO vs. MRVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBIO BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. | -11.92% | 178.75% | -32.03% | 429.79% | -54.32% | -76.54% | 102.88% | 27.22% |
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 240.32% | -22.82% | 83.79% | 63.68% | -57.48% | 84.62% | 80.25% | 11.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBIO and MRVL is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019 | 0.29 |
Fundamentals
BBIO:
$13.12B
MRVL:
$258.03B
BBIO:
-$3.76
MRVL:
$2.90
BBIO:
23.00
MRVL:
28.91
BBIO:
$566.04M
MRVL:
$8.72B
BBIO:
$538.20M
MRVL:
$4.41B
BBIO:
-$602.24M
MRVL:
$4.27B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBIO vs. MRVL — Risk / Return Rank
BBIO
MRVL
BBIO vs. MRVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. (BBIO) and Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBIO | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.59 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 12.37 | -8.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.25 | 28.64 | -19.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBIO | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 4.70 | -3.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.69 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.23 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
BBIO vs. MRVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBIO drawdown since its inception was -92.80%, roughly equal to the maximum MRVL drawdown of -91.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBIO and MRVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBIO | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.80% | -91.60% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.25% | -26.36% | +6.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.08% | -60.79% | +11.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.89% | -61.88% | -30.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.69% | -8.72% | -6.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.80% | -46.77% | +0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.07% | 11.37% | -3.30% |
Volatility
BBIO vs. MRVL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. (BBIO) is 12.10%, while Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a volatility of 38.50%. This indicates that BBIO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBIO | MRVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.10% | 38.50% | -26.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.41% | 54.32% | -19.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.75% | 69.56% | -22.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.95% | 61.51% | +24.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.80% | 51.77% | +32.03% |
Dividends
BBIO vs. MRVL - Dividend Comparison
BBIO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MRVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBIO BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc. | 0.08% | 0.28% | 0.22% | 0.40% | 0.65% | 0.21% | 0.50% | 0.90% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 1.73% | 2.72% |
Financials
BBIO vs. MRVL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BBIO vs. MRVL - Profitability Comparison
BBIO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 178.39M and revenue of 180.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.8%.
MRVL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.
BBIO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. reported an operating income of -105.96M and revenue of 180.60M, resulting in an operating margin of -58.7%.
MRVL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.
BBIO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. reported a net income of -164.04M and revenue of 180.60M, resulting in a net margin of -90.8%.
MRVL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BBIO and MRVL have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRVL has higher volatility (38.50%) compared to BBIO (12.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBIO dropped -92.80% vs MRVL's -91.60%.
MRVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBIO and MRVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer