BBIB vs. JTEK

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

BBIB (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF) and JTEK (JPMorgan U.S. Tech Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBIB is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Treasury Bond (3-10 Y), while JTEK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan. BBIB is passively managed, while JTEK is actively managed. Over the past year, BBIB returned 3.01% vs 28.36% for JTEK. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBIB charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for JTEK.

Performance

BBIB vs. JTEK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) and JPMorgan U.S. Tech Leaders ETF (JTEK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBIB achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than JTEK's 12.61% return.

BBIB

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -0.90%
• YTD: -0.73%
• 6M: -0.53%
• 1Y: 3.01%
• 3Y*: 3.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JTEK

• 1D: -7.07%
• 1M: -0.13%
• YTD: 12.61%
• 6M: 10.09%
• 1Y: 28.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBIB vs. JTEK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BBIB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF	-0.73%	7.44%	1.28%	5.32%
JTEK JPMorgan U.S. Tech Leaders ETF	12.61%	19.03%	28.69%	18.14%

Correlation

The correlation between BBIB and JTEK is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2023	0.06

BBIB vs. JTEK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BBIB	JTEK
Communication Services	99.8%	17.9%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.8%
Financial Services	-	4.5%
Healthcare	-	1.5%
Industrials	-	2.2%
Real Estate	-	1.0%
Technology	-	63.8%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BBIB vs. JTEK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBIB

BBIB Risk / Return Rank: 25
BBIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
BBIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
BBIB Omega Ratio Rank: 24
BBIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
BBIB Martin Ratio Rank: 25

JTEK

JTEK Risk / Return Rank: 29
JTEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
JTEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
JTEK Omega Ratio Rank: 31
JTEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
JTEK Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBIB vs. JTEK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) and JPMorgan U.S. Tech Leaders ETF (JTEK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBIB	JTEK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	1.12	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.33	1.55	-0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.20	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.08	1.29	-0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.17	3.76	-0.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBIB vs. JTEK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBIB Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the JTEK Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBIB and JTEK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBIB	JTEK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	1.12	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	1.11	-0.49

Drawdowns

BBIB vs. JTEK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBIB drawdown since its inception was -6.36%, smaller than the maximum JTEK drawdown of -30.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBIB and JTEK.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBIB	JTEK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.36%	-30.61%	+24.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.80%	-22.02%	+19.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.35%	-8.74%	+6.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.68%	-5.58%	+3.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	7.56%	-6.61%

Volatility

BBIB vs. JTEK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) is 1.10%, while JPMorgan U.S. Tech Leaders ETF (JTEK) has a volatility of 10.39%. This indicates that BBIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JTEK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBIB	JTEK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.10%	10.39%	-9.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.40%	20.17%	-17.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.40%	25.36%	-21.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.75%	27.69%	-22.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.75%	27.69%	-22.94%

BBIB vs. JTEK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBIB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than JTEK's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBIB vs. JTEK - Dividend Comparison

BBIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, while JTEK has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BBIB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF	3.93%	3.95%	3.76%	2.69%
JTEK JPMorgan U.S. Tech Leaders ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBIB and JTEK in my portfolio?

BBIB and JTEK have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBIB or JTEK?

JTEK has higher volatility (10.39%) compared to BBIB (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBIB dropped -6.36% vs JTEK's -30.61%.

Which ETF is better, BBIB or JTEK?

On 1-year performance, JTEK leads with 28.36% vs 3.01% for BBIB. On fees, BBIB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BBIB has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBIB or JTEK?

Over the 1-year period, JTEK has performed better with a 28.36% return vs 3.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBIB or JTEK?

BBIB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for JTEK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBIB or JTEK?

BBIB has the higher dividend yield at 3.93%, compared with 0.00% for JTEK.

What is the main difference between BBIB and JTEK?

BBIB is categorized as Government Bonds, while JTEK is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BBIB and 0.65% for JTEK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JTEK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.