BBIB vs. JEPQ

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

BBIB (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF) and JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBIB is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Treasury Bond (3-10 Y), while JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BBIB returned 3.31%/yr vs 19.56%/yr for JEPQ. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBIB charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.

Performance

BBIB vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBIB achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ's 6.12% return.

BBIB

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -0.90%
• YTD: -0.73%
• 6M: -0.53%
• 1Y: 3.01%
• 3Y*: 3.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JEPQ

• 1D: -3.01%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 6.12%
• 6M: 5.89%
• 1Y: 25.16%
• 3Y*: 19.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBIB vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BBIB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF	-0.73%	7.44%	1.28%	1.34%
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF	6.12%	15.18%	24.85%	20.19%

Correlation

The correlation between BBIB and JEPQ is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2023	0.05

BBIB vs. JEPQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BBIB	JEPQ
Communication Services	99.8%	15.4%
Basic Materials	-	1.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.1%
Energy	-	0.4%
Financial Services	-	0.4%
Healthcare	-	4.4%
Industrials	-	3.1%
Real Estate	-	0.2%
Technology	-	54.0%
Utilities	-	1.3%

Return for Risk

BBIB vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBIB

BBIB Risk / Return Rank: 25
BBIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
BBIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
BBIB Omega Ratio Rank: 24
BBIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
BBIB Martin Ratio Rank: 25

JEPQ

JEPQ Risk / Return Rank: 65
JEPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
JEPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
JEPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 71
JEPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
JEPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBIB vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBIB	JEPQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	2.09	-1.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.33	2.73	-1.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.41	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.08	2.87	-1.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.17	13.99	-10.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBIB vs. JEPQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBIB Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the JEPQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBIB and JEPQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBIB	JEPQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	2.09	-1.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.94	-0.32

Drawdowns

BBIB vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBIB drawdown since its inception was -6.36%, smaller than the maximum JEPQ drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBIB and JEPQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBIB	JEPQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.36%	-20.07%	+13.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.80%	-8.82%	+6.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.31%	-20.07%	+15.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.35%	-3.22%	+0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.68%	-3.42%	+1.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	1.80%	-0.85%

Volatility

BBIB vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF (BBIB) is 1.10%, while JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) has a volatility of 3.44%. This indicates that BBIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBIB	JEPQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.10%	3.44%	-2.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.40%	9.59%	-7.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.40%	12.13%	-8.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.75%	16.66%	-11.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.75%	16.66%	-11.91%

BBIB vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBIB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBIB vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison

BBIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than JEPQ's 10.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BBIB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 3-10 Year ETF	3.93%	3.95%	3.76%	2.69%	0.00%
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF	10.39%	10.53%	9.65%	10.03%	9.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBIB and JEPQ in my portfolio?

BBIB and JEPQ have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBIB or JEPQ?

JEPQ has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to BBIB (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBIB dropped -6.36% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.

Which ETF is better, BBIB or JEPQ?

On 3-year performance, JEPQ leads with 19.56% vs 3.31% for BBIB. On fees, BBIB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BBIB has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBIB or JEPQ?

Over the 3-year period, JEPQ has performed better with a 19.56% return vs 3.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBIB or JEPQ?

BBIB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBIB or JEPQ?

JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.39%, compared with 3.93% for BBIB.

What is the main difference between BBIB and JEPQ?

BBIB is categorized as Government Bonds, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. BBIB tracks ICE BofA US Treasury Bond (3-10 Y), while JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for BBIB and 0.35% for JEPQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.