BBHY vs. OILK
BBHY (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US High Yield Index, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBHY returned 4.03%/yr vs 16.92%/yr for OILK. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBHY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
BBHY vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBHY achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 58.67% return.
BBHY
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 6.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.52%
- 5Y*
- 4.03%
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 58.67%
- 6M
- 52.94%
- 1Y
- 53.67%
- 3Y*
- 17.93%
- 5Y*
- 16.92%
- 10Y*
- —
BBHY vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.29% | 8.51% | 7.81% | 11.98% | -10.37% | 3.88% | 5.36% | 14.35% | -2.50% | 6.57% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 58.67% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | -61.09% | 30.48% | -20.40% | 2.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBHY and OILK is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016 | 0.15 |
The correlation between BBHY and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.32 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BBHY vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BBHY
OILK
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
BBHY
OILK
Industrials
BBHY
OILK
-
Communication Services
BBHY
OILK
-
Healthcare
BBHY
OILK
-
Energy
BBHY
OILK
-
Financial Services
BBHY
OILK
-
Technology
BBHY
OILK
-
Real Estate
BBHY
OILK
-
Basic Materials
BBHY
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
BBHY
OILK
-
Utilities
BBHY
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBHY vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
BBHY
OILK
BBHY vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBHY | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.31 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 3.11 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.98 | 6.27 | +6.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBHY | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 1.87 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.56 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.11 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
BBHY vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBHY drawdown since its inception was -24.98%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBHY and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBHY | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.98% | -83.76% | +58.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.37% | -17.35% | +14.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.00% | -23.42% | +18.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.32% | -34.69% | +19.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -6.91% | +6.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.37% | -32.59% | +30.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 8.58% | -8.05% |
Volatility
BBHY vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) is 1.16%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 8.60%. This indicates that BBHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBHY | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 8.60% | -7.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.89% | 23.39% | -20.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65% | 28.86% | -25.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.26% | 30.12% | -22.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.53% | 35.96% | -28.43% |
BBHY vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBHY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBHY vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
BBHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, less than OILK's 8.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.97% | 7.24% | 7.18% | 6.49% | 5.92% | 4.06% | 4.73% | 4.99% | 5.02% | 4.81% | 1.42% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.46% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBHY and OILK have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (8.60%) compared to BBHY (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBHY dropped -24.98% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 16.92% vs 4.03% for BBHY. On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BBHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 16.92% return vs 4.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.46%, compared with 6.97% for BBHY.
BBHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while OILK is Oil & Gas. BBHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BBHY and 0.68% for OILK.
BBHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBHY and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer