BBHY vs. HYUP
BBHY (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and HYUP (Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - BBHY tracks the ICE BofA US High Yield Index while HYUP tracks the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market High Beta Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BBHY returned 4.03%/yr vs 4.34%/yr for HYUP. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBHY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for HYUP.
Performance
BBHY vs. HYUP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBHY achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly lower than HYUP's 1.38% return.
BBHY
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 6.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.52%
- 5Y*
- 4.03%
- 10Y*
- —
HYUP
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- 1.38%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 7.25%
- 3Y*
- 10.00%
- 5Y*
- 4.34%
- 10Y*
- —
BBHY vs. HYUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.29% | 8.51% | 7.81% | 11.98% | -10.37% | 3.88% | 5.36% | 14.35% | -3.04% |
HYUP Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF | 1.38% | 8.83% | 10.30% | 14.56% | -13.30% | 5.13% | 5.73% | 16.54% | -3.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBHY and HYUP is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2018 | 0.86 |
The correlation between BBHY and HYUP shifts across timeframes, from 0.86 (all time) to 0.96 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBHY vs. HYUP — Risk / Return Rank
BBHY
HYUP
BBHY vs. HYUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) and Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BBHY | HYUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.33 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 2.39 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.98 | 10.20 | +2.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BBHY | HYUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 1.71 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.53 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.51 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
BBHY vs. HYUP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBHY drawdown since its inception was -24.98%, roughly equal to the maximum HYUP drawdown of -24.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBHY and HYUP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBHY | HYUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.98% | -24.79% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.37% | -3.05% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.00% | -6.03% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.32% | -18.06% | +2.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.61% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.37% | -3.42% | +1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 0.71% | -0.18% |
Volatility
BBHY vs. HYUP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) is 1.16%, while Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYUP) has a volatility of 1.38%. This indicates that BBHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBHY | HYUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 1.38% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.89% | 3.37% | -0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65% | 4.26% | -0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.26% | 8.27% | -1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.53% | 9.75% | -2.22% |
BBHY vs. HYUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBHY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than HYUP's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBHY vs. HYUP - Dividend Comparison
BBHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, less than HYUP's 7.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.97% | 7.24% | 7.18% | 6.49% | 5.92% | 4.06% | 4.73% | 4.99% | 5.02% | 4.81% | 1.42% |
HYUP Xtrackers High Beta High Yield Bond ETF | 7.35% | 7.44% | 7.78% | 7.48% | 7.15% | 6.19% | 6.89% | 6.77% | 6.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, BBHY and HYUP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
HYUP has higher volatility (1.38%) compared to BBHY (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBHY dropped -24.98% vs HYUP's -24.79%.
On 5-year performance, HYUP leads with 4.34% vs 4.03% for BBHY. On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BBHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HYUP has performed better with a 4.34% return vs 4.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for HYUP.
HYUP has the higher dividend yield at 7.35%, compared with 6.97% for BBHY.
BBHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index, while HYUP tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market High Beta Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BBHY and 0.20% for HYUP.
BBHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BBHY and HYUP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer