PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBHY vs. BKLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBHY vs. BKLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) and Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBHY achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly higher than BKLN's -0.04% return.


BBHY

1D
-0.44%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
1.29%
6M
1.70%
1Y
6.84%
3Y*
8.52%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*

BKLN

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
-0.04%
6M
0.65%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
7.54%
5Y*
5.09%
10Y*
4.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBHY vs. BKLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBHY
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.29%8.51%7.81%11.98%-10.37%3.88%5.36%14.35%-2.50%6.57%
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
-0.04%6.88%8.21%12.53%-2.51%2.32%1.32%10.03%-1.32%2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between BBHY and BKLN is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.54

The correlation between BBHY and BKLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBHY vs. BKLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBHY
BKLN

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
2.3%

Industrials

8.4%
0.9%

Communication Services

7.9%
0.8%

Healthcare

5.4%
0.8%

Energy

5.2%

-

Financial Services

4.1%
1.9%

Technology

4.0%
5.7%

Real Estate

3.9%
0.8%

Basic Materials

3.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
0.7%

Utilities

2.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

BBHY
10.0%
BKLN
2.3%

Industrials

BBHY
8.4%
BKLN
0.9%

Communication Services

BBHY
7.9%
BKLN
0.8%

Healthcare

BBHY
5.4%
BKLN
0.8%

Energy

BBHY
5.2%
BKLN

-

Financial Services

BBHY
4.1%
BKLN
1.9%

Technology

BBHY
4.0%
BKLN
5.7%

Real Estate

BBHY
3.9%
BKLN
0.8%

Basic Materials

BBHY
3.2%
BKLN

-

Consumer Defensive

BBHY
2.5%
BKLN
0.7%

Utilities

BBHY
2.0%
BKLN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBHY vs. BKLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBHY
BBHY Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
BBHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BBHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

BKLN
BKLN Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
BKLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKLN Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BKLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKLN Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBHY vs. BKLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) and Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBHYBKLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.40

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

1.53

+1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.98

6.04

+6.94

BBHY vs. BKLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the BKLN Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBHY and BKLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBHYBKLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

1.71

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

1.14

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.64

0.00

Drawdowns

BBHY vs. BKLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBHY drawdown since its inception was -24.98%, roughly equal to the maximum BKLN drawdown of -24.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBHY and BKLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBHYBKLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.98%

-24.17%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.37%

-3.07%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.00%

-3.55%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.32%

-7.31%

-8.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.48%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-1.09%

-1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

0.78%

-0.25%

Volatility

BBHY vs. BKLN - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to Invesco Senior Loan ETF (BKLN) at 0.46%. This indicates that BBHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBHYBKLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

0.46%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

2.53%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.65%

2.76%

+0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.26%

4.47%

+2.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.53%

6.43%

+1.10%

BBHY vs. BKLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBHY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BKLN's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBHY vs. BKLN - Dividend Comparison

BBHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, more than BKLN's 6.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBHY
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.97%7.24%7.18%6.49%5.92%4.06%4.73%4.99%5.02%4.81%1.42%0.00%
BKLN
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
6.63%6.95%8.41%8.59%4.93%3.11%3.56%4.86%4.52%3.50%4.54%4.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBHY and BKLN have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBHY has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to BKLN (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBHY dropped -24.98% vs BKLN's -24.17%.

On 5-year performance, BKLN leads with 5.09% vs 4.03% for BBHY. On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BKLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BKLN has performed better with a 5.09% return vs 4.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BKLN.

BBHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.97%, compared with 6.63% for BKLN.

BBHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index, while BKLN tracks S&P/LSTA U.S. Leveraged Loan 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for BBHY and 0.65% for BKLN.

BBHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBHY and BKLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer