BBHM vs. SFYX
BBHM (BBH Select Mid Cap ETF) and SFYX (SoFi Next 500 ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - BBHM tracks the Actively Managed while SFYX tracks the Solactive SoFi US Next 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBHM charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for SFYX.
Performance
BBHM vs. SFYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BBHM
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 2.63%
- YTD
- 3.11%
- 6M
- 1.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFYX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBHM vs. SFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF | 3.11% | 0.98% |
SFYX SoFi Next 500 ETF | 5.66% | 4.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBHM and SFYX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBHM vs. SFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM) and SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBHM vs. SFYX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBHM | SFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.05% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.97% | — | — |
Volatility
BBHM vs. SFYX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBHM | SFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.20% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.20% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.20% | — | — |
BBHM vs. SFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBHM has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than SFYX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
BBHM vs. SFYX - Dividend Comparison
Neither BBHM nor SFYX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHM BBH Select Mid Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SFYX SoFi Next 500 ETF | 1.36% | 1.44% | 1.25% | 1.51% | 1.56% | 0.90% | 1.16% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBHM and SFYX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SFYX is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SFYX is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for BBHM.
SFYX has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.00% for BBHM.
BBHM tracks Actively Managed, while SFYX tracks Solactive SoFi US Next 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: BBH and Toroso Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.81% for BBHM and 0.00% for SFYX.
Find the right allocation for BBHM and SFYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer