PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBH vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBH vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF (BBH) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBH achieves a -1.85% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return. Over the past 10 years, BBH has underperformed DBO with an annualized return of 5.75%, while DBO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.37% annualized return.


BBH

1D
2.22%
1M
0.09%
YTD
-1.85%
6M
-5.32%
1Y
23.92%
3Y*
6.14%
5Y*
0.31%
10Y*
5.75%

DBO

1D
2.27%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
84.75%
6M
81.10%
1Y
80.26%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBH vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBH
VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF
-1.85%21.18%-4.29%3.94%-15.25%11.81%22.13%26.34%-10.70%16.46%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
84.75%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%-20.99%28.05%-15.22%4.86%

Correlation

The correlation between BBH and DBO is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2007

0.13

The correlation between BBH and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BBH vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBH
DBO

Healthcare

99.9%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

116.0%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

BBH
99.9%
DBO

-

Basic Materials

BBH

-

DBO

-

Communication Services

BBH

-

DBO

-

Consumer Cyclical

BBH

-

DBO

-

Consumer Defensive

BBH

-

DBO

-

Energy

BBH

-

DBO

-

Financial Services

BBH

-

DBO
116.0%

Industrials

BBH

-

DBO

-

Real Estate

BBH

-

DBO

-

Technology

BBH

-

DBO

-

Utilities

BBH

-

DBO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBH vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBH
BBH Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BBH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBH Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
BBH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBH Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBH vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF (BBH) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBHDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.38

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

4.44

-2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.81

9.02

-3.22

BBH vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBH Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBH and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBHDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

2.34

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.50

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.36

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.02

+0.36

Drawdowns

BBH vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBH drawdown since its inception was -72.70%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBH and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBHDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.70%

-90.18%

+17.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.55%

-18.19%

+7.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.74%

-28.20%

+5.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.86%

-37.68%

-2.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.86%

-61.69%

+21.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.81%

-51.38%

+37.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.75%

-62.25%

+41.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.13%

8.92%

-4.79%

Volatility

BBH vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF (BBH) is 6.06%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that BBH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBHDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.06%

12.61%

-6.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.28%

28.20%

-13.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.02%

34.46%

-15.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.50%

32.29%

-10.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.17%

31.78%

-9.61%

BBH vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBH vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

BBH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than DBO's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBH
VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF
0.51%0.51%0.80%0.43%0.47%0.21%0.36%0.34%0.50%0.55%0.30%0.27%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.90%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBH and DBO have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to BBH (6.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBH dropped -72.70% vs DBO's -90.18%.

On 10-year performance, DBO leads with 11.37% vs 5.75% for BBH. On fees, BBH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BBH has been the lower-risk option at 6.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBO has performed better with a 11.37% return vs 5.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.51% for BBH.

BBH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. BBH tracks MVIS US Listed Biotech 25 Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BBH and 0.78% for DBO.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBH and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer