BBH vs. BTEC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BBH (VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF) and BTEC (Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - BBH tracks the MVIS US Listed Biotech 25 Index while BTEC tracks the NASDAQ U.S. Health Care Innovators Index. Both are passively managed. BBH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BTEC.

Performance

BBH vs. BTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF (BBH) and Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BBH

• 1D: 2.22%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: -1.85%
• 6M: -5.32%
• 1Y: 23.92%
• 3Y*: 6.14%
• 5Y*: 0.31%
• 10Y*: 5.75%

BTEC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBH vs. BTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BBH VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF	-6.81%
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF	0.00%

BBH vs. BTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BBH	BTEC
Healthcare	99.9%	99.4%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	0.6%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BBH vs. BTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBH

BBH Risk / Return Rank: 37
BBH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
BBH Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
BBH Omega Ratio Rank: 33
BBH Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
BBH Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBH vs. BTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF (BBH) and Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBH	BTEC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.81	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBH	BTEC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	—	—

Drawdowns

BBH vs. BTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBH drawdown since its inception was -72.70%, which is greater than BTEC's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBH and BTEC.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBH	BTEC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.70%	0.00%	-72.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.81%	0.00%	-13.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.75%	0.00%	-20.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.13%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BBH	BTEC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.06%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.28%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.02%	0.00%	+19.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.50%	0.00%	+21.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.17%	0.00%	+22.17%

BBH vs. BTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BTEC's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBH vs. BTEC - Dividend Comparison

BBH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, while BTEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBH VanEck Vectors Biotech ETF	0.51%	0.51%	0.80%	0.43%	0.47%	0.21%	0.36%	0.34%	0.50%	0.55%	0.30%	0.27%
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, BBH or BTEC?

On fees, BBH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBH or BTEC?

BBH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BTEC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBH or BTEC?

BBH has the higher dividend yield at 0.51%, compared with 0.00% for BTEC.

What is the main difference between BBH and BTEC?

BBH tracks MVIS US Listed Biotech 25 Index, while BTEC tracks NASDAQ U.S. Health Care Innovators Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Principal. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BBH and 0.42% for BTEC.