PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBEU vs. CMIUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBEU vs. CMIUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) and Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio International Unconstrained Fund (CMIUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBEU achieves a 5.53% return, which is significantly lower than CMIUX's 8.79% return.


BBEU

1D
-1.22%
1M
2.67%
YTD
5.53%
6M
8.51%
1Y
18.25%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*

CMIUX

1D
0.33%
1M
3.94%
YTD
8.79%
6M
12.09%
1Y
21.97%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
10.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBEU vs. CMIUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BBEU
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF
5.53%36.37%1.85%20.31%-14.72%17.50%5.00%8.15%
CMIUX
Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio International Unconstrained Fund
8.79%33.36%2.63%20.07%-12.61%19.72%9.26%4.62%

Correlation

The correlation between BBEU and CMIUX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2019

0.95

The correlation between BBEU and CMIUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBEU vs. CMIUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBEU
BBEU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BBEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBEU Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BBEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBEU Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

CMIUX
CMIUX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CMIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CMIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBEU vs. CMIUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) and Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio International Unconstrained Fund (CMIUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBEUCMIUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.25

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

1.81

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.57

6.67

-1.10

BBEU vs. CMIUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the CMIUX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBEU and CMIUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBEUCMIUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

1.40

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.57

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.57

-0.10

Drawdowns

BBEU vs. CMIUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBEU drawdown since its inception was -36.27%, roughly equal to the maximum CMIUX drawdown of -36.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBEU and CMIUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBEUCMIUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.27%

-36.83%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.23%

-11.76%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.23%

-14.30%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.08%

-29.49%

-1.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.65%

-1.36%

-1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.14%

-5.73%

-0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

3.18%

+0.10%

Volatility

BBEU vs. CMIUX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio International Unconstrained Fund (CMIUX) at 5.32%. This indicates that BBEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMIUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBEUCMIUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

5.32%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.98%

12.80%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.49%

15.28%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.49%

17.84%

-0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.32%

19.73%

-0.41%

BBEU vs. CMIUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBEU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CMIUX's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBEU vs. CMIUX - Dividend Comparison

BBEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, more than CMIUX's 2.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBEU
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF
2.82%2.83%4.16%2.94%4.72%2.63%2.29%3.24%0.49%
CMIUX
Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio International Unconstrained Fund
2.41%2.62%2.96%2.25%2.98%1.93%1.81%1.55%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, BBEU and CMIUX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BBEU has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to CMIUX (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBEU dropped -36.27% vs CMIUX's -36.83%.

CMIUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBEU and CMIUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer