PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBD-A.TO vs. AEM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BBD-A.TO vs. AEM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Bombardier Inc (BBD-A.TO) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBD-A.TO achieves a 39.39% return, which is significantly higher than AEM.TO's 2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, BBD-A.TO has outperformed AEM.TO with an annualized return of 19.64%, while AEM.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 16.00% annualized return.


BBD-A.TO

1D
-0.27%
1M
16.41%
YTD
39.39%
6M
41.03%
1Y
237.41%
3Y*
78.20%
5Y*
59.69%
10Y*
19.64%

AEM.TO

1D
-3.65%
1M
-2.46%
YTD
2.74%
6M
1.24%
1Y
43.02%
3Y*
53.44%
5Y*
25.72%
10Y*
16.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBD-A.TO vs. AEM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBD-A.TO
Bombardier Inc
39.39%139.44%81.98%0.96%22.36%110.98%-57.73%-6.73%-31.80%30.90%
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
2.74%109.61%58.54%6.66%8.18%-22.88%13.71%46.75%-3.97%3.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BBD-A.TO and AEM.TO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 1989

0.05

Over the past year, BBD-A.TO and AEM.TO have become more correlated (0.26) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BBD-A.TO:

CA$32.62B

AEM.TO:

CA$119.77B

EPS

BBD-A.TO:

CA$9.32

AEM.TO:

CA$10.65

PE Ratio

BBD-A.TO:

34.82

AEM.TO:

22.41

PEG Ratio

BBD-A.TO:

0.89

AEM.TO:

0.33

PS Ratio

BBD-A.TO:

3.40

AEM.TO:

8.85

Total Revenue (TTM)

BBD-A.TO:

CA$9.60B

AEM.TO:

CA$13.56B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BBD-A.TO:

CA$1.88B

AEM.TO:

CA$8.26B

EBITDA (TTM)

BBD-A.TO:

CA$1.70B

AEM.TO:

CA$9.54B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBD-A.TO vs. AEM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBD-A.TO
BBD-A.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BBD-A.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBD-A.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBD-A.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
BBD-A.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBD-A.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

AEM.TO
AEM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
AEM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBD-A.TO vs. AEM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bombardier Inc (BBD-A.TO) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBD-A.TOAEM.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.63

1.02

+3.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.89

1.47

+3.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.20

+0.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

12.87

1.40

+11.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

38.92

3.45

+35.46

BBD-A.TO vs. AEM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBD-A.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.63, which is higher than the AEM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBD-A.TO and AEM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBD-A.TOAEM.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.63

1.02

+3.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.13

0.74

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.45

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.22

-0.08

Drawdowns

BBD-A.TO vs. AEM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBD-A.TO drawdown since its inception was -97.93%, which is greater than AEM.TO's maximum drawdown of -84.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBD-A.TO and AEM.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBD-A.TOAEM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.93%

-84.38%

-13.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.57%

-30.87%

+12.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.01%

-30.87%

-8.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.30%

-42.10%

-19.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.18%

-54.60%

-38.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.19%

-30.76%

+2.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.53%

-34.18%

-24.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.13%

12.50%

-6.37%

Volatility

BBD-A.TO vs. AEM.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bombardier Inc (BBD-A.TO) is 12.92%, while Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM.TO) has a volatility of 14.32%. This indicates that BBD-A.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBD-A.TOAEM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.92%

14.32%

-1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.55%

34.04%

+6.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.62%

42.46%

+9.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.09%

34.87%

+18.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.31%

35.86%

+20.45%

Dividends

BBD-A.TO vs. AEM.TO - Dividend Comparison

BBD-A.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AEM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEM.TO
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited
0.72%0.96%1.95%2.99%2.96%3.13%1.41%0.92%1.04%0.92%0.98%1.13%
BBD-A.TO
Bombardier Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BBD-A.TO vs. AEM.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bombardier Inc and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
1.57B
4.10B
(BBD-A.TO) Total Revenue
(AEM.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

BBD-A.TO vs. AEM.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bombardier Inc and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
15.6%
66.4%
Portfolio components
BBD-A.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bombardier Inc reported a gross profit of 245.90M and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.6%.

AEM.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 2.72B and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.4%.

BBD-A.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bombardier Inc reported an operating income of 175.08M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.

AEM.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 2.56B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 62.4%.

BBD-A.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bombardier Inc reported a net income of 52.13M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.

AEM.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 1.70B and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 41.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BBD-A.TO and AEM.TO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBD-A.TO and AEM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer