PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBCPX vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBCPX vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bridge Builder Core Plus Bond Fund (BBCPX) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBCPX achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 9.08% return. Over the past 10 years, BBCPX has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 2.32%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.47% annualized return.


BBCPX

1D
0.57%
1M
1.41%
YTD
0.03%
6M
0.89%
1Y
5.64%
3Y*
4.96%
5Y*
0.69%
10Y*
2.32%

IVV

1D
0.55%
1M
0.36%
YTD
9.08%
6M
9.43%
1Y
25.77%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
13.42%
10Y*
15.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBCPX vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBCPX
Bridge Builder Core Plus Bond Fund
0.03%8.97%2.28%6.58%-13.24%-0.29%9.27%9.31%0.34%4.20%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
9.08%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between BBCPX and IVV is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.03

Over the past year, BBCPX and IVV have become more correlated (0.35) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBCPX vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBCPX
BBCPX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
BBCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
BBCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBCPX vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridge Builder Core Plus Bond Fund (BBCPX) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBCPXIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.36

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

2.76

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.88

12.43

-7.56

BBCPX vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBCPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBCPX and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBCPX vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBCPX drawdown since its inception was -18.25%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBCPX and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBCPXIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.25%

-55.25%

+37.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.41%

-8.89%

+5.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.19%

-18.75%

+12.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.25%

-24.53%

+6.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.25%

-33.90%

+15.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-2.35%

+0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-10.77%

+6.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

1.97%

-0.82%

Volatility

BBCPX vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bridge Builder Core Plus Bond Fund (BBCPX) is 1.62%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 4.37%. This indicates that BBCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBCPXIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

4.37%

-2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.30%

9.59%

-6.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.38%

12.28%

-7.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.01%

16.95%

-10.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.90%

18.08%

-13.18%

BBCPX vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBCPX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBCPX vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

BBCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than IVV's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBCPX
Bridge Builder Core Plus Bond Fund
4.51%4.79%4.93%4.12%2.96%2.39%4.70%5.00%3.47%2.71%0.64%0.00%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.08%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBCPX and IVV have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVV has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to BBCPX (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBCPX dropped -18.25% vs IVV's -55.25%.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBCPX and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer