PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBCK.DE vs. XDEB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBCK.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (BBCK.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBCK.DE achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly higher than XDEB.DE's 1.74% return. Over the past 10 years, BBCK.DE has outperformed XDEB.DE with an annualized return of 11.96%, while XDEB.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.88% annualized return.


BBCK.DE

1D
0.98%
1M
1.42%
YTD
7.16%
6M
8.41%
1Y
21.98%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
10.80%
10Y*
11.96%

XDEB.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.52%
YTD
1.74%
6M
1.86%
1Y
-0.08%
3Y*
6.45%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*
6.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBCK.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBCK.DE
Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF
7.16%16.70%19.10%11.74%-6.44%30.65%1.65%35.47%-11.63%5.86%
XDEB.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C
1.74%-1.27%17.83%3.66%-4.06%24.01%-6.66%26.17%1.99%3.04%

Correlation

The correlation between BBCK.DE and XDEB.DE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2014

0.47

The correlation between BBCK.DE and XDEB.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBCK.DE vs. XDEB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBCK.DE
BBCK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
BBCK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBCK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBCK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BBCK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBCK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEB.DE
XDEB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XDEB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBCK.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (BBCK.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBCK.DEXDEB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.00

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.97

-0.02

+4.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.50

-0.03

+14.53

BBCK.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBCK.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the XDEB.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBCK.DE and XDEB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBCK.DEXDEB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

-0.01

+1.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.61

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

0.62

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.70

+0.16

Drawdowns

BBCK.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBCK.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.23%, which is greater than XDEB.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBCK.DE and XDEB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBCK.DEXDEB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.23%

-28.57%

-4.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.40%

-5.31%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.54%

-13.02%

-8.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.54%

-13.02%

-8.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.23%

-28.57%

-4.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.53%

+6.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.61%

-5.03%

+0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.51%

2.37%

-0.86%

Volatility

BBCK.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (BBCK.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C (XDEB.DE) at 2.63%. This indicates that BBCK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBCK.DEXDEB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

2.63%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.81%

5.56%

+2.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.63%

7.86%

+3.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.39%

10.16%

+5.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.85%

12.03%

+6.82%

BBCK.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBCK.DE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEB.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBCK.DE vs. XDEB.DE - Dividend Comparison

BBCK.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while XDEB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBCK.DE
Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF
1.69%1.88%1.79%1.75%1.97%1.18%1.61%1.84%1.35%1.18%1.63%1.28%
XDEB.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBCK.DE and XDEB.DE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEB.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEB.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for BBCK.DE.

BBCK.DE tracks Nasdaq Global Buyback Achievers, while XDEB.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for BBCK.DE and 0.25% for XDEB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBCK.DE and XDEB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer