PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBBS vs. XHYF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBBS vs. XHYF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) and BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF (XHYF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBBS achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly higher than XHYF's -0.10% return.


BBBS

1D
0.02%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.77%
6M
1.23%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XHYF

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
-0.10%
6M
0.51%
1Y
4.79%
3Y*
9.29%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBBS vs. XHYF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BBBS and XHYF is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024

0.46

The correlation between BBBS and XHYF shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBBS vs. XHYF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBBS
BBBS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BBBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBBS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
BBBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBBS Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

XHYF
XHYF Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XHYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHYF Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XHYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHYF Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBBS vs. XHYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) and BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF (XHYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBBSXHYFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.30

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

1.71

+1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.59

7.44

+5.15

BBBS vs. XHYF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBBS Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the XHYF Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBBS and XHYF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBBSXHYFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

1.57

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.37

0.73

+1.63

Drawdowns

BBBS vs. XHYF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBBS drawdown since its inception was -1.45%, smaller than the maximum XHYF drawdown of -12.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBBS and XHYF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBBSXHYFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.45%

-12.92%

+11.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.45%

-3.22%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.61%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.28%

-2.54%

+2.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

0.74%

-0.39%

Volatility

BBBS vs. XHYF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBS) is 0.49%, while BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF (XHYF) has a volatility of 0.94%. This indicates that BBBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XHYF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBBSXHYFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.49%

0.94%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.36%

2.58%

-1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87%

3.52%

-1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.23%

7.14%

-4.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.23%

7.14%

-4.91%

BBBS vs. XHYF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBBS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XHYF's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBBS vs. XHYF - Dividend Comparison

BBBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, less than XHYF's 6.27% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BBBS
Bondbloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
4.58%4.55%4.31%0.00%0.00%
XHYF
BondBloxx US High Yield Financial & REIT Sector ETF
6.27%6.73%7.11%7.00%5.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBBS and XHYF have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XHYF has higher volatility (0.94%) compared to BBBS (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBBS dropped -1.45% vs XHYF's -12.92%.

On 1-year performance, XHYF leads with 4.79% vs 4.44% for BBBS. On fees, BBBS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BBBS has been the lower-risk option at 0.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XHYF has performed better with a 4.79% return vs 4.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBBS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XHYF.

XHYF has the higher dividend yield at 6.27%, compared with 4.58% for BBBS.

BBBS is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while XHYF is High Yield Bonds. BBBS tracks Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 1-5 Year Index, while XHYF tracks ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Financial & REIT. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBBS and 0.35% for XHYF.

BBBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBBS and XHYF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer