BBB vs. MFUL

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BBB (CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF) and MFUL (Mindful Conservative ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. BBB is passively managed, while MFUL is actively managed. Over the past year, BBB returned 0.25% vs 4.79% for MFUL. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BBB charges 0.98%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for MFUL.

Performance

BBB vs. MFUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF (BBB) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBB achieves a -0.67% return, which is significantly lower than MFUL's 2.75% return.

BBB

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.41%
• 6M: -0.59%
• YTD: -0.67%
• 1Y: 0.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.95%

MFUL

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -0.18%
• 6M: 1.42%
• YTD: 2.75%
• 1Y: 4.79%
• 3Y*: 4.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -0.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BBB CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF	$66.52K	$79.94K	$49.31K
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF	$6.81K	$15.69K	$11.16K

BBB vs. MFUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BBB CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF	-0.67%	9.73%	38.82%	-0.86%
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF	2.75%	4.51%	5.36%	-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between BBB and MFUL is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2023	0.63

The correlation between BBB and MFUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BBB vs. MFUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBB

BBB Risk / Return Rank: 10
BBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
BBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
BBB Omega Ratio Rank: 9
BBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
BBB Martin Ratio Rank: 9

MFUL

MFUL Risk / Return Rank: 42
MFUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
MFUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
MFUL Omega Ratio Rank: 42
MFUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
MFUL Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBB vs. MFUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF (BBB) and Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBB	MFUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.09	1.07	-1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.00	1.49	-1.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.20	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.09	1.38	-1.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.22	4.99	-5.21

BBB vs. MFUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBB Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the MFUL Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBB and MFUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BBB vs. MFUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBB drawdown since its inception was -21.98%, which is greater than MFUL's maximum drawdown of -16.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBB and MFUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBB	MFUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.98%	-16.41%	-5.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.74%	-3.36%	-14.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.70%	-0.97%	-6.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.61%	-9.20%	+4.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.60%	0.93%	+6.67%

Volatility

BBB vs. MFUL - Volatility Comparison

CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF (BBB) has a higher volatility of 4.18% compared to Mindful Conservative ETF (MFUL) at 1.07%. This indicates that BBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBB	MFUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.18%	1.07%	+3.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.66%	3.58%	+10.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.18%	4.31%	+13.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.75%	4.27%	+17.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.75%	4.27%	+17.48%

BBB vs. MFUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBB has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUL's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBB vs. MFUL - Dividend Comparison

BBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than MFUL's 2.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BBB CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF	0.16%	0.21%	6.74%	0.00%	0.00%
MFUL Mindful Conservative ETF	2.41%	3.31%	2.59%	5.00%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBB and MFUL in my portfolio?

BBB and MFUL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBB or MFUL?

BBB has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to MFUL (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBB dropped -21.98% vs MFUL's -16.41%.

Which ETF is better, BBB or MFUL?

On 1-year performance, MFUL leads with 4.79% vs 0.25% for BBB. On fees, BBB is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, MFUL has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBB or MFUL?

Over the 1-year period, MFUL has performed better with a 4.79% return vs 0.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBB or MFUL?

BBB is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for MFUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBB or MFUL?

MFUL has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 0.16% for BBB.

What is the main difference between BBB and MFUL?

They also come from different issuers: CYBER HORNET and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for BBB and 1.10% for MFUL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MFUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.