PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBB vs. MDAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBB vs. MDAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF (BBB) and Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBB achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than MDAA's 22.13% return.


BBB

1D
-1.05%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
0.99%
6M
-0.49%
1Y
6.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MDAA

1D
-1.11%
1M
8.24%
YTD
22.13%
6M
22.52%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBB vs. MDAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BBB and MDAA is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025

0.75

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBB vs. MDAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBB
BBB Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
BBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBB Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
BBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBB Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

MDAA
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBB vs. MDAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF (BBB) and Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF (MDAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBBMDAADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.96

BBB vs. MDAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBBMDAADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

1.47

-0.58

Drawdowns

BBB vs. MDAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBB drawdown since its inception was -21.98%, which is greater than MDAA's maximum drawdown of -14.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBB and MDAA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBBMDAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.98%

-14.59%

-7.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.16%

-1.11%

-5.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.39%

-2.93%

-1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.94%

Volatility

BBB vs. MDAA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBBMDAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.54%

23.89%

-6.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.02%

23.89%

-1.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.02%

23.89%

-1.87%

BBB vs. MDAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBB has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than MDAA's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBB vs. MDAA - Dividend Comparison

BBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than MDAA's 0.38% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BBB and MDAA have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MDAA is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MDAA is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for BBB.

MDAA has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.21% for BBB.

They also come from different issuers: CYBER HORNET and Myriad. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for BBB and 0.97% for MDAA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBB and MDAA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer