PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBB vs. HISF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBB vs. HISF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF (BBB) and First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF (HISF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBB achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly higher than HISF's 0.14% return.


BBB

1D
-0.38%
1M
-2.32%
YTD
0.61%
6M
-0.75%
1Y
6.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HISF

1D
0.11%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.14%
6M
0.49%
1Y
5.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBB vs. HISF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BBB and HISF is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2024

0.23

The correlation between BBB and HISF shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBB vs. HISF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBB
BBB Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
BBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBB Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
BBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBB Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

HISF
HISF Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
HISF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HISF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
HISF Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
HISF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
HISF Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBB vs. HISF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF (BBB) and First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF (HISF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBBHISFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.30

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

1.86

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.94

6.71

-5.76

BBB vs. HISF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBB Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the HISF Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBB and HISF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBBHISFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

1.63

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

1.32

-0.45

Drawdowns

BBB vs. HISF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBB drawdown since its inception was -21.98%, which is greater than HISF's maximum drawdown of -3.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBB and HISF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBBHISFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.98%

-3.86%

-18.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.74%

-2.90%

-14.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.52%

-1.09%

-5.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.40%

-0.89%

-3.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.95%

0.80%

+6.15%

Volatility

BBB vs. HISF - Volatility Comparison

CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Bitcoin 75/25 Strategy ETF (BBB) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to First Trust High Income Strategic Focus ETF (HISF) at 1.21%. This indicates that BBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HISF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBBHISFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

1.21%

+2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.01%

2.60%

+10.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.50%

3.32%

+14.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.01%

3.95%

+18.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.01%

3.95%

+18.06%

BBB vs. HISF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBB has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than HISF's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBB vs. HISF - Dividend Comparison

BBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than HISF's 5.00% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BBB and HISF have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBB has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to HISF (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBB dropped -21.98% vs HISF's -3.86%.

On 1-year performance, BBB leads with 6.55% vs 5.36% for HISF. On fees, HISF is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, HISF has been the lower-risk option at 1.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BBB has performed better with a 6.55% return vs 5.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HISF is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for BBB.

HISF has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 0.21% for BBB.

They also come from different issuers: CYBER HORNET and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for BBB and 0.87% for HISF.

HISF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBB and HISF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer